• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Challenges with study procedure fidelity when conducting household survey: reports from the field.进行家庭调查时研究程序保真度面临的挑战:来自实地的报告。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 7;12(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4500-0.
2
Online survey tools: ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees.在线调查工具:人类研究伦理委员会的伦理和方法学问题
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Jun;4(2):37-48. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37.
3
Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.可穿戴设备用户感知的伦理问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
4
Patient privacy: how far is too far?患者隐私:何种程度才算过度?
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Feb;48(2):50-1.
5
Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.吸引研究参与者以指导移动成像、普适传感和位置跟踪研究的伦理行为。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0426-4.
6
Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: challenges and strategies.亲密伴侣暴力研究中的伦理行为:挑战与策略。
Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.005.
7
Saying privacy, meaning confidentiality.说隐私,意思是保密。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Nov;11(11):44-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.608243.
8
HIPAA--Implications for research.《健康保险流通与责任法案》——对研究的影响。
Orthop Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):139-42. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200503000-00011.
9
Protecting patient privacy redux: response to open peer commentaries on "'you don't know me, but …': access to patient data and subject recruitment in human subjects research".保护患者隐私再探讨:对关于“你不了解我,但……:人类受试者研究中获取患者数据与受试者招募”的公开同行评论的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.646911.
10
Linking Survey and Twitter Data: Informed Consent, Disclosure, Security, and Archiving.将调查数据和 Twitter 数据关联:知情同意、披露、安全和归档。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Feb-Apr;15(1-2):63-76. doi: 10.1177/1556264619853447. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study on cultural sensitivity during survey fieldwork for early childhood caries in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: bridging the gap between culture and science.尼日利亚伊费岛幼儿龋齿调查实地工作中文化敏感性的定性研究:弥合文化与科学之间的差距
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Aug 11;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07422-w.
2
Associations between oral habits, dental anxiety, dental service utilization, and maternal mental health status among 6- to 12-year-old children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊费市 6-12 岁儿童口腔习惯、牙科焦虑、牙科服务利用与母亲心理健康状况的关系。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Apr;24(2):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00767-x. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
3
Risk indicators for dental caries, and gingivitis among 6-11-year-old children in Nigeria: a household-based survey.尼日利亚 6-11 岁儿童龋齿和牙龈炎的风险指标:基于家庭的调查。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02470-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol development, treatment fidelity, adherence to treatment, and quality control.方案制定、治疗保真度、治疗依从性和质量控制。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;67(2):146-53. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006213.
2
Enhancing intervention fidelity: a means of strengthening study impact.提高干预保真度:增强研究影响力的一种方式。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2006 Apr;11(2):80-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2006.00050.x.
3
Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.提高健康行为改变研究中的治疗保真度:美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟的最佳实践与建议
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443.
4
Adherence to research protocols in a clinical context: challenges and recommendations from behavioral intervention trials.临床环境中对研究方案的依从性:行为干预试验的挑战与建议
Am J Psychother. 2003;57(3):348-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2003.57.3.348.
5
A checklist for critiquing treatment fidelity studies.
Ment Health Serv Res. 2000 Jun;2(2):107-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1010109205676.
6
Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial.促进干预保真度。早期联盟预防试验的概念问题、方法和初步结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1 Suppl):38-47. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00272-5.

进行家庭调查时研究程序保真度面临的挑战:来自实地的报告。

Challenges with study procedure fidelity when conducting household survey: reports from the field.

作者信息

Folayan Morenike Oluwatoyin, Alade Micheal O, Oziegbe Elizabeth O

机构信息

Department of Child Dental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 7;12(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4500-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-019-4500-0
PMID:31391107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686494/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to identify reasons for protocol deviations during conduct of large epidemiological surveys despite training of field workers, validating clinicians, and providing field supervisory support. Enquiries focused on breaches of recruitment procedures, privacy, confidentiality, and informed consent. The case study was a household survey conducted in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

RESULTS

The study reveals that despite training of field workers, providing supervisory support, and conducting validation exercises, protocol deviation still occurred. Measures to improve internal research validity during the conduct of surveys can minimise but not eliminate protocol deviations. Individual and environmental factors increase the risk for protocol deviation. Individual factors include personal bias against adherence to elements of the protocols, and pressure to meet personal recruitment targets to maximise remuneration. These pressures increase the risk of breaching study participants' recruitment process. Environmental pressures resulted from low research literacy that made it possible for field workers not to consent participants and for participants not to prioritise privacy. The use of electronic data collection enhanced data security. A key recommendation from the study was that improved field supervision will reduce the risk for protocol violation.

摘要

目标

本研究的目的是确定在进行大型流行病学调查过程中,尽管对现场工作人员进行了培训、对临床医生进行了验证并提供了现场监督支持,但仍出现方案偏离的原因。调查重点是违反招募程序、隐私、保密和知情同意的情况。该案例研究是在尼日利亚伊费进行的一项家庭调查。

结果

研究表明,尽管对现场工作人员进行了培训、提供了监督支持并进行了验证工作,但方案偏离仍有发生。在调查过程中提高内部研究效度的措施可以将方案偏离降至最低,但无法消除。个人因素和环境因素会增加方案偏离的风险。个人因素包括对遵守方案要素的个人偏见,以及为了最大化薪酬而达到个人招募目标的压力。这些压力增加了违反研究参与者招募流程的风险。环境压力源于研究素养较低,这使得现场工作人员有可能不征得参与者同意,且参与者也不将隐私视为优先事项。使用电子数据收集提高了数据安全性。该研究的一项关键建议是,加强现场监督将降低违规风险。