Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭患者住院后使用盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂与出院后结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use after hospitalization of patients with heart failure and post-discharge outcomes: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0124, C/O Salina Gu, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1175-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) are an underutilized therapy for heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the current impact of hospitalization on MRA use is not well characterized. The objective of this study was to describe contemporary MRA prescription for heart failure patients before and after the full scope of hospitalizations and the association between MRA discharge prescription and post-hospitalization outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an academic hospital system in 2013-2016. Among 1500 included hospitalizations of 1009 unique patients with HFrEF and without MRA contraindication, the mean age was 71.9 ± 13.6 years and 443 (29.5%) were female. We compared MRA prescription before and after hospitalizations with McNemar's test and between patients with principal and secondary diagnoses of HFrEF with the chi-square test, and association of MRA discharge prescription with 30-day and 180-day mortality and readmissions using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

MRA prescriptions increased from 303 (20.2%) to 375 (25.0%) at discharge (+4.8%, p < 0.0001). More patients with principal diagnosis of HFrEF compared to those hospitalized for other reasons received MRA (34.9% versus 21.3%, p < 0.0001) and had them initiated (21.8% versus 9.7%, p < 0.0001). MRA prescription at discharge was not associated with mortality or readmission at 30 and 180 days, and there was no interaction with principal/secondary diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized HFrEF patients, 75% did not receive MRA before or after hospitalization, and nearly 90% of eligible patients did not have MRA initiated. As we found no signal for short-term harm after discharge, hospitalization may represent an opportunity to initiate guideline-directed heart failure therapy.

摘要

背景

对于射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者,醛固酮受体拮抗剂(MRA)是一种未充分利用的治疗方法,但目前住院对 MRA 使用的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是描述心力衰竭患者在住院前后的当代 MRA 处方情况,以及出院时 MRA 处方与住院后结局之间的关系。

方法

我们在 2013-2016 年在一家学术医院系统中进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在纳入的 1500 例住院患者中(1009 例患者为唯一患者),有 HFrEF 且无 MRA 禁忌证,平均年龄为 71.9±13.6 岁,443 例(29.5%)为女性。我们使用 McNemar 检验比较了住院前后的 MRA 处方情况,使用卡方检验比较了主要诊断和次要诊断为 HFrEF 的患者之间的 MRA 处方情况,并使用广义估计方程比较了出院时 MRA 处方与 30 天和 180 天死亡率和再入院率的关系。

结果

出院时 MRA 处方从 303 例(20.2%)增加到 375 例(25.0%)(增加了 4.8%,p<0.0001)。与因其他原因住院的患者相比,主要诊断为 HFrEF 的患者接受 MRA 的比例更高(34.9% 比 21.3%,p<0.0001),并开始使用 MRA(21.8% 比 9.7%,p<0.0001)。出院时 MRA 处方与 30 天和 180 天的死亡率或再入院率无关,且与主要/次要诊断无交互作用。

结论

在住院的 HFrEF 患者中,75%的患者在住院前后未接受 MRA 治疗,近 90%的符合条件的患者未开始使用 MRA。由于我们在出院后没有发现短期危害的信号,因此住院可能是开始指南推荐的心力衰竭治疗的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验