Suppr超能文献

警觉和回避调节风格的结构和功能神经关联。

Structural and functional neural correlates of vigilant and avoidant regulation style.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, G 9A, 48149 Muenster, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, G 9A, 48149 Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 Nov 1;258:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regulation of emotional arousal is a relevant factor for mental health. The investigation of neural underpinnings of regulation styles in healthy individuals may provide important insights regarding potential risk factors. To fill the gap of structural correlates of regulation styles and to expand previous results, we focused on the association between brain structure, neural responsiveness and vigilant/avoidant regulation style.

METHODS

In n = 302 healthy individuals regulation style was assessed with the Mainz Coping Inventory (MCI). Participants underwent structural and functional MRI during an emotion-processing paradigm. Structural MRI (voxel-based morphometry) and functional MRI were analysed in two regions of interest (amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex [ACC]).

RESULTS

Regulation styles did not show an association with brain structure after correction for gender, age, trait anxiety, depressive symptoms. During emotion processing, a vigilant regulation style was negatively associated with ACC activation.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional study in a non-pathological sample is not adequate to unveil causalities or draw conclusions regarding prevention interventions.

CONCLUSION

Regulation styles are associated with specific neural activation patterns. The association of a high-vigilant regulation style and low ACC activation during emotion processing in healthy participants might be a potential risk factor.

摘要

背景

情绪唤醒的调节是心理健康的一个相关因素。对健康个体调节方式的神经基础的研究可能为潜在的风险因素提供重要的见解。为了填补调节方式的结构相关性的空白,并扩展以前的结果,我们专注于大脑结构、神经反应性与警觉/回避调节方式之间的关联。

方法

在 n=302 名健康个体中,使用美因茨应对量表(MCI)评估调节方式。参与者在情绪处理范式中接受结构和功能磁共振成像。结构磁共振成像(基于体素的形态测量学)和功能磁共振成像在两个感兴趣的区域(杏仁核和前扣带皮层 [ACC])进行分析。

结果

在对性别、年龄、特质焦虑、抑郁症状进行校正后,调节方式与大脑结构之间没有关联。在情绪处理过程中,警觉的调节方式与 ACC 激活呈负相关。

局限性

横断面研究在非病理样本中不足以揭示因果关系或对预防干预措施得出结论。

结论

调节方式与特定的神经激活模式有关。在健康参与者的情绪处理过程中,高警觉的调节方式与 ACC 激活降低之间的关联可能是一个潜在的风险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验