Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde Aplicada ao Esporte e à Atividade Física, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Physical Therapy and Post-Graduation Interdisciplinary Health Science, Department of Human Movement Science (DHMS), Physical Therapy, University Federal of São Paulo, 11015020, Campus Baixada Santista, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Apr;35(3):621-631. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02858-6. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of adding photobiomodulation therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to volleyball athletes' training, focusing on muscle strength and jumping skills. Thirty-six athletes were randomly placed into three groups: control, photobiomodulation therapy, and NMES. The athletes trained to improve their muscle strength and jumping skills. The athletes in the photobiomodulation therapy group were submitted to photobiomodulation therapy (850 nm, continuous, energy density 0.8 J/cm, radiant energy per point 6 J, total radiant energy 36 J) before undergoing strength and plyometric training. The NMES group additionally underwent NMES-based quadriceps femoris muscle strength training (base frequency 1 kHz, frequency modulation 70 Hz, intensity maximum tolerable). The variables analyzed were muscle strength, jumping ability, global impression, and jump frequency; they were measured at baseline and during follow-ups at 6 and 8 weeks. The statistical analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The between-group differences and their respective 95% CIs were calculated using linear mixed models by using group, time, and group-versus-time interaction terms. Dominant lower limb strength improved the most in the NMES group compared to the control group (mean difference = 1.4, 95% CI = .5 to 2.4). Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group (mean difference = 1.1, 95% CI = .3 to 2) and the NMES group (mean difference = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.8) compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved more than the photobiomodulation therapy group (mean difference = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.7). The NMES group had the greatest improvement in global perceived effect scale compared to the control group (mean difference = 1.1, 95% CI = 1 to 2.2). Dominant lower limb strength improved in the NMES group compared to the control group. Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group and the NMES group compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved significantly more than the photobiomodulation therapy group; the NMES group also improved in the global perceived effect scale compared to the control group. This study found that, for volleyball athletes, photobiomodulation therapy and NMES both promoted benefits in terms of muscle-strength gain. In addition, these benefits were maintained for 2 weeks even after training was interrupted. Dominant lower limb strength improved in the NMES group compared to the control group. Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group and the NMES group compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved significantly more than the photobiomodulation therapy group; the NMES group also improved in global impression of jumps compared to the control group.
本研究旨在探讨在排球运动员训练中加入光生物调节疗法和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对肌肉力量和跳跃技能的有效性。36 名运动员被随机分为三组:对照组、光生物调节疗法组和 NMES 组。运动员接受训练以提高肌肉力量和跳跃技能。光生物调节疗法组的运动员在进行力量和增强式训练之前接受光生物调节疗法(850nm,连续,能量密度 0.8J/cm,每个点的辐射能 6J,总辐射能 36J)。NMES 组还接受基于 NMES 的股四头肌力量训练(基础频率 1kHz,频率调制 70Hz,强度最大耐受)。分析的变量包括肌肉力量、跳跃能力、整体印象和跳跃频率;在基线和 6 周和 8 周的随访时进行测量。使用线性混合模型基于意向治疗进行统计分析。使用组、时间和组-时间交互项计算组间差异及其各自的 95%置信区间(CI)。与对照组相比,NMES 组的主导下肢力量改善最大(平均差异=1.4,95%CI=0.5 至 2.4)。与对照组相比,光生物调节疗法组(平均差异=1.1,95%CI=0.3 至 2)和 NMES 组(平均差异=1.9,95%CI=1.1 至 2.8)的非主导下肢力量均增加,但 NMES 组的改善大于光生物调节疗法组(平均差异=0.8,95%CI=0.1 至 1.7)。与对照组相比,NMES 组在整体感知效果量表上的改善最大(平均差异=1.1,95%CI=1 至 2.2)。与对照组相比,NMES 组的主导下肢力量改善。与对照组相比,光生物调节疗法组和 NMES 组的非主导下肢力量均增加,但 NMES 组的改善明显大于光生物调节疗法组;NMES 组在整体感知跳跃效果量表上的得分也高于对照组。本研究发现,对于排球运动员,光生物调节疗法和 NMES 均可促进肌肉力量的增加。此外,即使在训练中断后,这些益处仍能维持 2 周。与对照组相比,NMES 组的主导下肢力量改善。与对照组相比,光生物调节疗法组和 NMES 组的非主导下肢力量均增加,但 NMES 组的改善明显大于光生物调节疗法组;NMES 组在跳跃整体印象方面的得分也高于对照组。