Ramo Brandon A, Funk Shawn S, Elliott Marilyn E, Jo Chan-Hee
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Mar;40(3):e203-e209. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001439.
Lateral condyle fractures account for 15% to 20% of pediatric elbow fractures. Among numerous proposed classification systems, the Song classification appears the most comprehensive. The utility of any classification system relies on its ability to be descriptive, reproducible, and to guide prognosis/treatment. We assessed the Song classification by applying it to 736 retrospectively treated patients.
A total of 736 pediatric patients with lateral condyle fractures were identified between 2007 and 2014. In total, 60 patients were selected for a radiographic interclass and intraclass correlation study. Radiographs of the patients were reviewed by 6 observers, who independently measured radiographs for displacement on radiographs and assigned a Song classification. Treatment and outcomes were then reviewed on all 736 patients and evaluated as a successful outcome when achieving a healed fracture at discharge without significant complication or necessitating a change from initial treatment modality.
Weighted κ values for intrarater and interrater reliability to assign Song classification indicated excellent agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients of 6 observers measuring displacement on radiographs in millimeters indicated good to excellent agreement. In total, 106 Song 1 fracture were primarily treated by casting alone and only 5.5% required conversion to operative intervention. Overall, 139 Song 2 fractures were treated by closed treatment (n=114, 82% successful nonoperatively, 16% converted to operative management) or surgical means (n=25, 100% success) without treatment superiority (P>0.999) and both modalities had high success rates. Song 3 fractures (n=17) demonstrated a failure rate of 80% with casting (n=10) and were better managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (n=7, 100% success, P=0.002). Song 4 (n=325) fractures had low success rate (34%) with casting (n=35), but achieved higher success rates (P<0.001) when managed with either closed (n=57) or open reduction (n=233) and pin fixation (89.5% and 92.7% success, respectively, P=0.401). Song 5 fractures (n=149) generally required an open reduction in our series with good success rates (91.2%).
This study validates the Song classification with high interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The Song classification improves on existing classification systems by better distinguishing fractures at risk for failure of nonoperative treatment and guiding treatment outcomes.
Level IV.
外侧髁骨折占儿童肘部骨折的15%至20%。在众多提出的分类系统中,宋氏分类似乎最为全面。任何分类系统的实用性都依赖于其描述性、可重复性以及指导预后/治疗的能力。我们通过将宋氏分类应用于736例接受回顾性治疗的患者来评估该分类系统。
2007年至2014年间共确定了736例患有外侧髁骨折的儿童患者。总共选择了60例患者进行影像学组间和组内相关性研究。6名观察者对患者的X线片进行了复查,他们独立测量X线片上的移位情况并指定宋氏分类。然后对所有736例患者的治疗和结果进行了复查,并在出院时骨折愈合且无明显并发症或无需改变初始治疗方式时评估为成功结果。
评定宋氏分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性的加权κ值表明一致性极佳。6名观察者测量X线片上以毫米为单位的移位情况的组内相关系数表明一致性良好至极佳。总共,106例宋氏1型骨折主要仅通过石膏固定治疗,仅5.5%需要转为手术干预。总体而言,139例宋氏2型骨折通过闭合治疗(n = 114,非手术成功率82%,16%转为手术治疗)或手术方法(n = 25,成功率100%)进行治疗,两种治疗方式无优越性差异(P > 0.999),且两种方式成功率均较高。宋氏3型骨折(n = 17)采用石膏固定(n = [10])的失败率为80%,采用闭合复位经皮穿针固定(n = 7,成功率100%,P = 0.002)治疗效果更好。宋氏4型骨折(n = 325)采用石膏固定(n = 35)的成功率较低(34%),但采用闭合(n = 57)或切开复位(n = 233)及穿针固定时成功率较高(P < 0.001)(分别为89.5%和92.7%成功,P = 0.401)。在我们的系列研究中,宋氏5型骨折(n = 149)通常需要切开复位,成功率较高(91.2%)。
本研究验证了宋氏分类具有较高的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。宋氏分类通过更好地区分非手术治疗失败风险的骨折并指导治疗结果,对现有分类系统进行了改进。
四级。