Chakravarthy Usha, Bailey Clare C, Scanlon Peter H, McKibbin Martin, Khan Rehna S, Mahmood Sajjad, Downey Louise, Dhingra Narendra, Brand Christopher, Brittain Christopher J, Willis Jeffrey R, Venerus Alessandra, Muthutantri Anushini, Cantrell Ronald A
Queen's University of Belfast Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Ireland.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Nov;3(11):920-926. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
To estimate the direct ophthalmic healthcare resource use in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Retrospective analysis of anonymized data derived from electronic medical records (EMRs) acquired at 10 clinical sites in the United Kingdom.
Patients aged ≥50 years with ≥1 eye with a clinical record of GA or, for comparison, bilateral early/intermediate AMD. Four subgroups were identified: GA in both eyes (GA:GA); GA in 1 eye, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the fellow eye (GA:CNV); GA in 1 eye with early or intermediate AMD in the fellow eye (GA:E); and early/intermediate AMD in both eyes (E:E).
The EMRs were analyzed to derive the median number of visits over the first 2 years after diagnosis of GA or early/intermediate AMD. Clinical tests recorded at visits were used to calculate estimated costs (payer perspective) of monitoring. Analyses were restricted to patients with an initial diagnosis on or after January 1, 2011, to represent present day monitoring and costs associated with AMD.
Median number of visits and estimated monitoring costs per patient (in £) over the first 2 years among patients with ≥2 years of follow-up and in the individual subgroups. Intravitreal treatment costs in the GA:CNV group were excluded.
For all 3 GA subgroups (n = 1080), the median number of visits over the first 2 years was 5, and monitoring costs were £460.80 per patient. The GA:CNV subgroup (n = 355) had the highest number of visits (median, 15), with a cost of £1581, compared with the GA:E subgroup (n = 283; median 4 visits; cost ∼£369) and the GA:GA subgroup (n = 442; median 3 visits; cost ∼£277). Ophthalmic tests were conducted most frequently in the GA:CNV subgroup. Visits and costs in the E:E subgroup (n = 6079) were lower.
Resource use in patients with GA varies considerably and is strongly influenced by the concomitant presence of CNV and lack of monitoring strategies for GA.
评估年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发地图样萎缩(GA)患者的直接眼科医疗资源使用情况。
对从英国10个临床站点获取的电子病历(EMR)中的匿名数据进行回顾性分析。
年龄≥50岁、至少1只眼有GA临床记录的患者,或作为对照的双眼早期/中期AMD患者。确定了四个亚组:双眼GA(GA:GA);一只眼GA,对侧眼脉络膜新生血管(CNV)(GA:CNV);一只眼GA,对侧眼早期或中期AMD(GA:E);以及双眼早期/中期AMD(E:E)。
分析EMR以得出GA或早期/中期AMD诊断后前2年的就诊次数中位数。就诊时记录的临床检查临床检查用于计算监测的估计成本(支付方视角)。分析仅限于2011年1月1日或之后初次诊断的患者,以代表当前与AMD相关的监测和成本。
随访≥2年的患者以及各个亚组中每位患者前2年的就诊次数中位数和估计监测成本(单位:英镑)。GA:CNV组的玻璃体内注射治疗成本被排除在外。
对于所有3个GA亚组(n = 1080),前2年的就诊次数中位数为5次,每位患者的监测成本为460.80英镑。GA:CNV亚组(n = 355)的就诊次数最多(中位数为15次),成本为1581英镑,相比之下,GA:E亚组(n = 283;中位数4次就诊;成本约369英镑)和GA:GA亚组(n = 442;中位数3次就诊;成本约277英镑)。眼科检查在GA:CNV亚组中进行得最为频繁。E:E亚组(n = 6079)的就诊次数和成本较低。
GA患者的资源使用差异很大,并且受到CNV的并存以及缺乏GA监测策略的强烈影响。