Shunyi District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China; Research Center for Preventive Medicine of Beijing, Beijing, China.
Food Microbiol. 2019 Dec;84:103233. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 31.
Globally, V. parahaemolyticus infection is a leading cause of bacterial diarrheal diseases. Pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus strains that produce hemolysins are responsible for these diseases. The composition of pathogenic and non-pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus and the change of the bacterial composition before and after traditional selective enrichment in a single sample associated with disease outbreak remain unclear. We investigated an outbreak by using next generation sequencing and digital PCR to address those questions. NGS showed that the V. parahaemolyticus caused the outbreak belonged to s single clone. In contrast, among the seven non-pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus isolated from the suspected food sample, 4 serotypes and 6 PFGE patterns were identified. And nearly 70,000 SNPs were identified among the non-pathogenic strains. This result confirmed that the outbreak was caused by V. parahaemolyticus. Furthermore, NGS results clearly showed the diversity of non-pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in a single contaminated food sample. The ratios of non-pathogenic and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus were 31.41 and 620.11 in the original and enriched food samples respectively showed by digital PCR. Meta-genomic data indicated the top 3 species were Weissella cibaria, Weissella confusa, and Enterobacter cloacae in the original food sample, and Vibrio sp Ex25, Vibrio sp 712i, and V. parahaemolyticus in the enriched sample. Therefore, the combing of NGS and digital PCR results showed that traditional Vibrio selective enrichment media could facilitate the growth of Vibrios, however, it provided no advantages to pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus. Hence, our results indicated that the traditional culture methods alone may lead to wrong conclusions and so improvements in culture methods are needed.
全球范围内,副溶血性弧菌感染是导致细菌性腹泻病的主要原因。产生溶血素的致病性副溶血性弧菌菌株是导致这些疾病的原因。致病性和非致病性副溶血性弧菌的组成以及与疾病爆发相关的单一样本中传统选择性富集前后细菌组成的变化尚不清楚。我们使用下一代测序和数字 PCR 来调查暴发,以解决这些问题。NGS 显示,引起暴发的副溶血性弧菌属于单个克隆。相比之下,从疑似食品样本中分离出的 7 株非致病性副溶血性弧菌中,鉴定出 4 种血清型和 6 种 PFGE 模式。并且在非致病性菌株中鉴定出近 70,000 个 SNP。这一结果证实了暴发是由副溶血性弧菌引起的。此外,NGS 结果清楚地显示了单一污染食品样本中非致病性副溶血性弧菌的多样性。数字 PCR 结果显示,原始和富集食品样本中非致病性和致病性副溶血性弧菌的比例分别为 31.41%和 620.11%。宏基因组数据表明,原始食品样本中的前 3 种物种为韦荣球菌属(Weissella cibaria)、中间韦荣球菌(Weissella confusa)和阴沟肠杆菌(Enterobacter cloacae),而富集样本中的前 3 种物种为副溶血弧菌 Ex25、副溶血弧菌 712i 和副溶血性弧菌。因此,NGS 和数字 PCR 结果的结合表明,传统的弧菌选择性富集培养基可以促进弧菌的生长,但对致病性副溶血性弧菌没有优势。因此,我们的结果表明,单独使用传统培养方法可能会导致错误的结论,因此需要改进培养方法。