Zhan Z L, Xin Y M, Li H M, Sun C J
Department of Orthopedics, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya 572000, China.
Department of Orthopedic, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 13;99(30):2375-2382. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.30.010.
To appraise the clinical outcomes of barbed suture in closure of total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register,Cochrane Library,Highwire,China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI),VIP and Wanfang database) were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing barbed sutures and conventional sutures in total hip and total knee arthroplasty published before January, 2019. Finally, 11 articles (12 randomized controlled trials) involving 1 629 hips or knees were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager software. Compared with conventional sutures,barbed sutures resulted in shorter total wound closure time (0.001), less ecchymosis and needle prick (both 0.05).There was no significant differences in terms of wound related complications, superficial infection, stitch abscess, blister, exudation, broken sutures, range of motionand KSS between barbed sutures and conventional sutures(all 0.05). Based on available level Ⅰ evidence, it indicated that knotless barbed suture maybe a better approach for wound closure in total hip and total knee arthroplasty.
评估倒刺缝线在全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术切口缝合中的临床效果。检索数据库(科学网、Embase、PubMed、Cochrane对照试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆、Highwire、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、维普和万方数据库),查找2019年1月以前发表的比较倒刺缝线和传统缝线在全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术中应用的随机对照试验。最终,本研究纳入11篇文章(12项随机对照试验),涉及1629个髋关节或膝关节。使用Review Manager软件进行荟萃分析。与传统缝线相比,倒刺缝线可缩短总伤口闭合时间(P=0.001),减少瘀斑和针刺伤(均P=0.05)。倒刺缝线与传统缝线在伤口相关并发症、浅表感染、缝线脓肿、水泡、渗出、缝线断裂、活动范围和膝关节协会评分(KSS)方面无显著差异(均P>0.05)。基于现有的Ⅰ级证据,表明无结倒刺缝线可能是全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术伤口闭合的更好方法。