Lau Kimberly M, Derry Katrina, Dalton Ashley, Martino Janine
P T. 2019 Aug;44(8):481-496.
Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated "formulary, outpatient-restricted use only." This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.
A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.
Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.
In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.
当需要不频繁给药、严重不良反应风险较低或预计病情不会迅速改善时,可考虑将肿瘤学和血液学药物的使用限制在门诊输液中心。在加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD),我们为指定为“仅限门诊受限使用的处方药物”创建了一种新的处方状态。这种指定可以通过消除住院需求来优化支付方的报销,并提高患者的舒适度。当在UCSD要求对受限药物进行住院给药时,会有一个定义松散的审查过程,包括请求开处方者与肿瘤学药学与治疗学(P&T)主任之间的非正式谈话。与这种处方状态和非正式请求过程相关的患者结局有限。本研究的目的是描述在一个单中心、学术性和综合性癌症中心的住院环境中,仅限门诊使用的肿瘤学和血液学处方药物的使用情况。
在2015年1月1日至2017年5月1日期间进行了一项回顾性病历审查。主要结局是确定在住院环境中使用并持续到门诊环境的仅限门诊使用的肿瘤学或血液学处方药物的百分比。次要结局包括总生存期、临终关怀登记、疾病进展状态、支持药物使用的证据水平和成本。
23名患者和24种门诊受限药物符合纳入标准。13种(54%)药物出院后继续使用,8种(33%)未在门诊继续使用。这8种药物中有5种因患者死亡而停用。
在这项单中心研究中,约三分之一的门诊受限药物出院后未继续使用。研究结果表明,我们的非正式批准过程可能导致仅限门诊使用的肿瘤学和血液学适应证处方药物使用不当。更正式的请求过程可能会导致这些药物得到更有效的利用。