Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1137-1144. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06382-7. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
To investigate the frequency, determinants, clinical implications, and costs of recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) in secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations.
This retrospective study included 2225 abdominal imaging examinations from outside institutions that were reinterpreted as part of standard clinical care at a tertiary care center in a one-year time frame.
Two hundred forty-six RAIs were present in 231 of 2225 reports (10.4%) of secondary abdominal imaging interpretations. Patient age and experience of the radiologist who performed the secondary interpretation were independently significantly associated with the presence of an RAI (both p = 0.002), with odds ratios of 0.99 per year increase in patient age (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.00) and 1.06 per year increase in experience of the radiologist (95% CI, 1.02-1.10). If followed, RAIs changed clinical management in 31.2%. Total costs of all 246 RAIs, whether performed or not by the referring physicians, amounted to €71,032.21, thus resulting in €31.92 per secondary abdominal imaging interpretation. Total costs of the 140 RAIs that were actually performed by the referring physicians amounted to €42,683.08, resulting in €19.18 per secondary abdominal imaging interpretation.
The frequency of RAIs in reports of secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations (which appear to be affected by patients' age and radiologists' experience) and associated costs are non-negligible. However, RAIs not infrequently change clinical management. The presented data may be helpful to radiology departments and healthcare policy makers to make well-informed decisions on the value and facilitation of the practice of secondary interpretations.
• Frequency of recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) in secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations at a tertiary care center is approximately 10.4%. • RAIs appear to be more frequently issued in younger patients and by more experienced radiologists, and if followed by referring clinicians, change clinical management in about one third of cases. • RAI costs per secondary interpretation in the Dutch Healthcare system are €31.92 (considering all RAIs) or €19.18 (considering only those RAIs that are actually performed).
研究对二级腹部影像学检查进行重新解读时额外影像学检查建议(RAIs)的频率、决定因素、临床意义和成本。
本回顾性研究纳入了在一年时间内在一家三级护理中心进行标准临床护理的 2225 例来自外部机构的腹部影像学检查。
在 2225 例二级腹部影像学检查报告中,有 231 例(10.4%)存在 246 个 RAIs。患者年龄和进行二次解读的放射科医生的经验与存在 RAI 独立显著相关(两者均 p=0.002),患者年龄每增加 1 年,比值比为 0.99(95%置信区间 [CI],0.98-1.00),放射科医生经验每增加 1 年,比值比为 1.06(95%CI,1.02-1.10)。如果遵循这些建议,RAIs 将改变 31.2%的临床管理。所有 246 个 RAI 的总费用(无论是否由转诊医生执行)为 71032.21 欧元,因此,每个二级腹部影像学检查解读的费用为 31.92 欧元。由转诊医生实际执行的 140 个 RAI 的总费用为 42683.08 欧元,因此,每个二级腹部影像学检查解读的费用为 19.18 欧元。
在三级医疗机构对腹部影像学检查进行二级解读的报告中,RAIs 的频率(似乎受患者年龄和放射科医生经验的影响)及其相关成本不可忽视。然而,RAIs 并不少见地会改变临床管理。本研究提供的数据可能有助于放射科和医疗保健政策制定者,以便对二级解读的价值和便利性做出明智的决策。
三级医疗机构中对腹部影像学检查进行二级解读时,建议进行额外影像学检查(RAIs)的频率约为 10.4%。
RAIs 似乎更频繁地出现在年轻患者和经验更丰富的放射科医生的报告中,如果被转诊医生采纳,约有三分之一的情况下会改变临床管理。
在荷兰医疗保健系统中,每个二级解读的 RAI 成本为 31.92 欧元(考虑所有 RAI)或 19.18 欧元(仅考虑实际执行的 RAI)。