Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Sep;33(9):933-945. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000577. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Before drawing conclusions on the contribution of an effective intervention to daily practice and initiating dissemination, its quality and implementation in daily practice should be optimal. The aim of this process evaluation was to study these aspects alongside a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a multidisciplinary biannual medication review in long-term care organizations (NTR3569).
Process evaluation with multiple measurements.
Thirteen units for people with dementia in six long-term care organizations in the Netherlands.
Physicians, pharmacists, and nursing staff of participating units.
The PROPER intervention is a structured and biannually repeated multidisciplinary medication review supported by organizational preparation and education, evaluation, and guidance.
Web-based questionnaires, interviews, attendance lists of education sessions, medication reviews and evaluation meetings, minutes, evaluation, and registration forms.
Participation rates in education sessions (95%), medication reviews (95%), and evaluation meetings (82%) were high. The intervention's relevance and feasibility and applied implementation strategies were highly rated. However, the education sessions and conversations during medication reviews were too pharmacologically oriented for several nursing staff members. Identified barriers to implementation were required time, investment, planning issues, and high staff turnover; facilitators were the positive attitude of professionals toward the intervention, the support of higher management, and the appointment of a local implementation coordinator.
Implementation was successful. The commitment of both higher management and professionals was an important factor. This may partly have been due to the subject being topical; Dutch long-term-care organizations are pressed to lower inappropriate psychotropic drug use.
在对有效干预措施对日常实践的贡献得出结论并开始传播之前,应确保其质量和在日常实践中的实施达到最佳水平。本过程评估的目的是在一项针对多学科半年一次药物审查对长期护理机构影响的随机对照试验(NTR3569)中,研究这些方面。
具有多项测量的过程评估。
荷兰六个长期护理机构的 13 个为痴呆症患者服务的单位。
参与单位的医生、药剂师和护理人员。
PROPER 干预措施是一种结构化的、每半年重复一次的多学科药物审查,辅以组织准备和教育、评估和指导。
基于网络的问卷调查、访谈、教育课程出席名单、药物审查和评估会议、会议记录、评估和登记表格。
教育课程(95%)、药物审查(95%)和评估会议(82%)的参与率很高。干预措施的相关性和可行性以及应用的实施策略得到了高度评价。然而,对于一些护理人员来说,教育课程和药物审查期间的讨论过于偏向药理学。实施的障碍包括所需的时间、投资、规划问题和高员工流失率;促进因素包括专业人员对干预措施的积极态度、高层管理人员的支持以及任命一名当地实施协调员。
实施是成功的。高层管理和专业人员的承诺是一个重要因素。这可能部分是由于主题的相关性;荷兰长期护理机构面临着降低不适当的精神药物使用的压力。