Mondal Dhrubajyoti, Majee Mithun Chandra, Bhattacharya Kisholoy, Long Jérôme, Larionova Joulia, Khusniyarov Marat M, Chaudhury Muktimoy
School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700 032, India.
Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier (ICGM), team IMNO, UMR 5253, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSM, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
ACS Omega. 2019 Jun 18;4(6):10558-10570. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03656. eCollection 2019 Jun 30.
Five neutral bis(μ-phenoxido)dicopper(II) complexes, [Cu(L)] (), [Cu(L)]·CHCl (), [Cu(L )]·2HO (), [Cu(L )] (), and [Cu(L )]·HO () have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses, magnetic studies, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, in which the ligands [HL = ,-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-','-dimethylethylene-1,2-diamine, HL = ,-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-','-dimethylethylene-1,2-diamine, HL = ,-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-diisopropylbenzyl)-','-diisopropylethylene-1,2-diamine, HL = ,-bis(2-hydroxy-3--butyl-5-methylbenzyl)-','-diisopropylethylene-1,2-diamine, and HL = ,-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-di--butylbenzyl)-','-diisopropylethylene-1,2-diamine] contain the same [O,N,N,O]-donor atoms combination but differ in substituents at phenol rings and at an amino nitrogen atom. The effect of these remote substituents on the nature of exchange coupling interactions (ferromagnetic vs antiferromagnetic) between the copper(II) ions has been investigated. The average Cu-O-Cu angle, Cu-O-Cu-O torsion angle, and Cu···Cu separation in are varied systematically by these remote ligand substituents in the range 98.6-83.3°, 26.0-46.5°, and 2.982-2.633 Å, respectively. As a result, the intramolecular spin-spin coupling in these complexes are changing gradually from a strong antiferromagnetic ( = -395 cm, where = - ) to a moderate ferromagnetic ( = +53.2 cm) regime. The crossover angle at which the magnetic interaction changes from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic ( = 0) is determined to be ca. 87° for this series of dicopper(II) complexes. DFT calculations support the experimentally determined crossover angle and disclose various magneto-structural correlations in the series .
已合成了五种中性双(μ-苯氧基)二铜(II)配合物,即[Cu(L)]()、[Cu(L)]·CHCl()、[Cu(L )]·2HO()、[Cu(L )]()和[Cu(L )]·HO(),并通过单晶X射线衍射分析、磁性研究和密度泛函理论(DFT)计算对其进行了表征,其中配体[HL = ,-双(2-羟基-3,5-二甲基苄基)-','-二甲基乙烯-1,2-二胺,HL = ,-双(2-羟基-3,5-二甲基苄基)-','-二甲基乙烯-1,2-二胺,HL = ,-双(2-羟基-3,5-二异丙基苄基)-','-二异丙基乙烯-1,2-二胺,HL = ,-双(2-羟基-3--丁基-5-甲基苄基)-','-二异丙基乙烯-1,2-二胺,HL = ,-双(2-羟基-3,5-二--丁基苄基)-','-二异丙基乙烯-1,2-二胺]含有相同的[O,N,N,O]供体原子组合,但在酚环和氨基氮原子处的取代基不同。研究了这些远程取代基对铜(II)离子之间交换耦合相互作用性质(铁磁与反铁磁)的影响。在中,平均Cu-O-Cu角、Cu-O-Cu-O扭转角和Cu···Cu间距分别在98.6 - 83.3°、26.0 - 46.5°和2.982 - 2.633 Å范围内被这些远程配体取代基系统地改变。结果,这些配合物中的分子内自旋-自旋耦合逐渐从强反铁磁( = -395 cm,其中 = - )转变为中等铁磁( = +53.2 cm)状态。对于这一系列二铜(II)配合物,确定磁相互作用从反铁磁变为铁磁( = 0)的交叉角约为87°。DFT计算支持实验确定的交叉角,并揭示了系列中的各种磁结构相关性。