He Jiafa, Liu Heping, Deng Li, Wei Xiangling, Chen Taiying, Xia Shangzhou, Liu Yubin
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Yiyang Bio-technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e029823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029823.
The influence of obesity on the outcomes of curative liver resection for malignancies remains controversial. We aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes of liver resection for malignancy between obese and non-obese patients.
This was a population-based, retrospective, observational study using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest all-payer US inpatient care database.
Hospitalisations of adults ≥18 years old with diagnoses of primary hepatobiliary malignancy or secondary malignant neoplasms of liver in the USA were identified from the NIS database between 2005 and 2014.
Data of 18 398 patients ≥18 years old and underwent liver resection without pancreatic resection in the NIS were extracted. All included subjects had primary hepatobiliary malignancy or secondary malignant neoplasms of the liver. Patients were divided into obese and non-obese groups. These groups were compared with respect to postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and hospital cost according to surgical extent and approach.
Patients were undergoing lobectomy of liver or partial hepatectomy.
The primary endpoints of this study were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and hospital cost.
After adjustment, obese patients were significantly more likely to experience postoperative complications than were non-obese patients (adjusted OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.42), regardless of whether lobectomy or partial hepatectomy was performed. Furthermore, obesity was significantly associated with increased risk of postoperative complications in patients who underwent open liver resection, but not laparoscopic resection. No significant difference was observed in length of hospital stay or total hospital costs between obese and non-obese patients.
After adjustment for preoperative comorbidities and other potential confounders, obesity is significantly associated with greater risk of complications in patients undergoing open liver resection for malignancy, but not laparoscopic resection.
肥胖对恶性肿瘤肝切除治疗效果的影响仍存在争议。我们旨在比较肥胖和非肥胖患者恶性肿瘤肝切除的院内结局。
这是一项基于人群的回顾性观察性研究,使用来自美国最大的全付费者住院护理数据库——全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据。
从2005年至2014年的NIS数据库中识别出美国≥18岁诊断为原发性肝胆恶性肿瘤或肝脏继发性恶性肿瘤的住院患者。
提取了NIS中18398例≥18岁且未行胰腺切除的肝切除患者的数据。所有纳入的受试者均患有原发性肝胆恶性肿瘤或肝脏继发性恶性肿瘤。患者分为肥胖组和非肥胖组。根据手术范围和入路,比较两组患者的术后并发症、住院时间和住院费用。
患者接受肝叶切除术或部分肝切除术。
本研究的主要终点是术后并发症、住院时间和住院费用。
调整后,无论进行肝叶切除术还是部分肝切除术,肥胖患者术后发生并发症的可能性均显著高于非肥胖患者(调整后的比值比为1.25,95%置信区间为1.10至1.42)。此外,肥胖与接受开放性肝切除患者术后并发症风险增加显著相关,但与腹腔镜切除患者无关。肥胖和非肥胖患者的住院时间或总住院费用未观察到显著差异。
在对术前合并症和其他潜在混杂因素进行调整后,肥胖与接受恶性肿瘤开放性肝切除患者的并发症风险显著增加相关,但与腹腔镜切除患者无关。