Department of Psychological Sciences.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019 Dec;56(4):449-458. doi: 10.1037/pst0000252. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
With rising rates of misinformation, psychotherapists are likely to encounter clients with distorted beliefs that are scientifically unsound. In situations where these beliefs are harmful (e.g., vaccination refusal, misunderstanding of sexual consent), psychotherapists may face an ethical dilemma regarding how to proceed with psychotherapy. This is especially true if such beliefs are impairing treatment progress or resulting in safety concerns for the client or society. Questions about whether and how the psychotherapist should address these distorted beliefs are therefore likely to arise. In such cases, psychotherapists are tasked with respecting the client's autonomy, while simultaneously being of maximum benefit to the client and to society at large. Not all distorted beliefs warrant therapeutic intervention, but this judgment requires careful consideration. The current article addresses the relevant ethical considerations for navigating and addressing distorted beliefs in psychotherapy. A vignette is offered, and relevant sections of the American Psychological Association's Ethics Code are discussed, both as they pertain to this scenario and as they apply more generally to the practice of psychotherapy. The article concludes with questions for psychotherapists to consider and recommendations for how to proceed when confronted with harmful distorted beliefs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
随着错误信息的不断增加,心理治疗师可能会遇到具有扭曲的、不符合科学依据的信念的客户。在这些信念具有危害性的情况下(例如,拒绝接种疫苗、对性同意的误解),心理治疗师在如何继续进行心理治疗方面可能会面临伦理困境。如果这些信念会妨碍治疗进展或导致客户或社会的安全问题,这种情况尤其如此。因此,关于心理治疗师是否应该以及如何处理这些扭曲的信念的问题很可能会出现。在这种情况下,心理治疗师的任务是尊重客户的自主权,同时最大限度地为客户和整个社会提供帮助。并非所有扭曲的信念都需要治疗干预,但这种判断需要仔细考虑。本文针对在心理治疗中应对和处理扭曲信念的相关伦理问题进行了探讨。提供了一个案例,并讨论了美国心理协会伦理准则的相关部分,这些内容既与该情景有关,也更普遍地适用于心理治疗实践。文章最后提出了心理治疗师需要考虑的问题,并就如何处理具有危害性的扭曲信念提出了建议。(美国心理协会,2019)