• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年髋部骨折患者术前期间的痛苦体验:患者和护士的观点。

Experiences of suffering among elderly hip-fracture patients during the preoperative period: patients' and nurse's perspective.

机构信息

Helse Fonna HF, Haugesund, Norway.

Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Haugesund, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Jun;34(2):409-419. doi: 10.1111/scs.12742. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/scs.12742
PMID:31487059
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Norway, 6000 patients were operated on due to hip fracture in 2016. Hip fracture results in increased suffering and often in a dramatic change in an older person's life. The experience of suffering in patients with hip fracture, or nursing staff's perception of it in the preoperative period, is sparsely studied. The perspective of the study was based on caring sciences.

AIM

The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of subjective experiences of suffering among elderly hip-fracture patients during the preoperative period, seen from the patients' and nurses' perspective.

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH

A Q-methodological approach was used. Forty statements (Q-sample), based on interviews and theory, were ranked in a forced-choice distribution curve from 'mostly agree' to 'mostly disagree', followed by postinterviews. Nine patients and five nurses participated. A by-person factor analysis in the form of principal component analysis with varimax and hand rotation was conducted.

RESULTS

Three factors, also called viewpoints, emerged as follows: (i) 'Feeling safe through presence, trust and hope'; (ii) 'Feeling safe occurs when the patient is seen, met and informed'; and (iii) 'Feeling alone and angry at oneself'. A polarisation between participants occurred, since the youngest patients (median age 73), the oldest patients (median age 90) and the nurses were represented in each specific factor.

CONCLUSION

There exist differences between how the nursing staff, the youngest and the oldest elderly patients experienced the preoperative period and what can enhance or alleviate their suffering. Where the youngest elderly communicated safety through trust and relatives' presence, the oldest elderly communicated insecurity in relation to staff and experienced severe pain and loneliness. Nursing staff and one patient emphasised the importance of seeing the patient in the first meeting to establish a feeling of security.

摘要

背景

2016 年,挪威有 6000 名髋部骨折患者接受了手术。髋部骨折会导致患者承受更多痛苦,通常会使老年人的生活发生巨大变化。对于髋部骨折患者的痛苦体验,或者术前护理人员对其的感知,研究甚少。本研究的视角基于关怀科学。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解老年髋部骨折患者在术前期间的主观痛苦体验,从患者和护士的角度来看。

方法

采用 Q 方法学方法。基于访谈和理论,设计了 40 个陈述(Q 样本),并在强制选择分布曲线上从“非常同意”到“非常不同意”进行排序,随后进行了访谈。共有 9 名患者和 5 名护士参与了研究。采用主成分分析与方差极大和手动旋转的个人因素分析法进行分析。

结果

出现了三个因素,也称为观点:(i)“通过存在、信任和希望感到安全”;(ii)“当患者被看到、被接触并被告知时,就会感到安全”;(iii)“感到孤独和自责”。参与者之间出现了两极分化,因为最年轻的患者(中位数年龄 73 岁)、最年长的患者(中位数年龄 90 岁)和护士都代表了每个特定的因素。

结论

护理人员、最年轻和最年长的老年患者对术前期间的体验以及可以增强或减轻他们痛苦的因素存在差异。最年轻的老年患者通过信任和亲属的存在来传达安全感,而最年长的老年患者则在与医护人员的关系中感到不安,并经历了严重的疼痛和孤独感。护理人员和一名患者强调了在初次见面时看到患者的重要性,以建立安全感。

相似文献

1
Experiences of suffering among elderly hip-fracture patients during the preoperative period: patients' and nurse's perspective.老年髋部骨折患者术前期间的痛苦体验:患者和护士的观点。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Jun;34(2):409-419. doi: 10.1111/scs.12742. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Like an ace up the sleeve: an interview study of nurses' experiences of the contact with relatives in a somatic emergency ward.如同暗藏的王牌:一项关于护士在躯体急诊病房与亲属接触经历的访谈研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1207-1214. doi: 10.1111/scs.12566. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Suffering related to dignity among patients at a psychiatric hospital.精神病院患者中与尊严相关的痛苦。
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Mar;21(2):148-62. doi: 10.1177/0969733013493216. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
Prehospital emergency care for patients with suspected hip fractures after falling - older patients' experiences.跌倒后疑似髋部骨折患者的院前急救护理——老年患者的经历
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Nov;23(21-22):3115-23. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12550. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Patients' experiences of nurses' heartfelt hospitality as caring: A qualitative approach.患者对护士贴心关怀的体验:一种定性研究方法。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):1903-1912. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14701. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Strategies in caring for women with postpartum psychosis--an interview study with psychiatric nurses.产后精神病女性的护理策略——一项对精神科护士的访谈研究
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1333-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01717.x.
7
"I struggle to count my blessings": recovery after hip fracture from the patients' perspective.“我努力数算自己的福气”:髋部骨折患者的康复体验。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 19;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0716-4.
8
Patients' and nurses' experiences of the caring relationship in hospital: an aware striving for trust.患者与护士在医院护理关系中的体验:对信任的自觉追求。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Dec;21(4):500-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00497.x.
9
The Femoral Nerve Block Setting the Agenda for Nursing Care of Older Patients With hip Fractures-A Qualitative Study.股神经阻滞:为老年髋部骨折患者的护理设定议程——一项定性研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 May 30;9:23779608231177533. doi: 10.1177/23779608231177533. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Encountering the older confused patient: professional carers' experiences.照料老年痴呆患者:专业护理人员的经历。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Dec;21(4):515-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00505.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of feeling safe perioperatively: a concept analysis.手术期间安全感的感知:概念分析。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2216018. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2216018.
2
Between Heaven and Hell: Experiences of Preoperative Pain and Pain Management among Older Patients with Hip Fracture.在天堂与地狱之间:老年髋部骨折患者术前疼痛及疼痛管理的体验
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 May 6;8:23779608221097450. doi: 10.1177/23779608221097450. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.
Q 方法论在医疗保健研究中的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7.