• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较不同血管化淋巴结转移术治疗上肢或下肢淋巴水肿患者的长期临床结局。

Comparisons in long-term clinical outcomes among patients with upper or lower extremity lymphedema treated with diverse vascularized lymph node transfer.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 2020 Feb;40(2):130-136. doi: 10.1002/micr.30508. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1002/micr.30508
PMID:31489971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is an emerging surgical treatment for lymphedema. However, literature-comparing outcomes of upper limb lymphedema (ULL) and lower limb lymphedema (LLL) is limited. Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the long-term clinical outcomes on ULL versus LLL in patients treated with VLNT.

METHODS

A retrospective study retrieving data from patients with International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stages II-III who underwent different VLNTs from July 2010 to July 2016 in our institution was performed. Demographics preoperatively, and clinical data (limb circumference, infectious episodes, lymphoscintigraphic studies) preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. Clinical outcomes by extremity were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients with lymphedema (ULL: n = 30, LLL: n = 53) were included. Mean follow-up time was 32.8 months (range 24-49 months). Mean circumference reduction was higher in patients with ULL compared to with LLL (28.6 ± 8.6 vs. 22.3 ± 10.1, p < .001), and for patients with secondary lymphedema (24.8 ± 9.6, p < .001) than for patients with primary lymphedema (18.9 ± 14, p > .05). Infectious episodes per year preoperative and postoperative showed that LLL patients had higher reduction on infection rate compared with ULL patients (2.4 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.2, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

VLNT is a promising surgical treatment option for patients with lymphedema. This study suggests that VLNT may have a more beneficial outcome in patients with ULL and with secondary lymphedema.

摘要

背景

带血管化淋巴结转移(VLNT)是一种新兴的治疗淋巴水肿的手术方法。然而,将上肢淋巴水肿(ULL)和下肢淋巴水肿(LLL)的文献进行比较的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在比较接受 VLNT 治疗的患者的 ULL 与 LLL 的长期临床结果。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2010 年 7 月至 2016 年 7 月期间在我院接受不同 VLNT 的国际淋巴学会(ISL)II-III 期患者的数据。记录了术前和术后的人口统计学数据,以及临床数据(肢体周长、感染发作、淋巴闪烁扫描研究)。还分析了按肢体分类的临床结果。

结果

共纳入 83 例淋巴水肿患者(ULL:n=30,LLL:n=53)。平均随访时间为 32.8 个月(范围 24-49 个月)。与 LLL 相比,ULL 患者的周长缩小程度更高(28.6±8.6 与 22.3±10.1,p<0.001),继发性淋巴水肿患者(24.8±9.6,p<0.001)比原发性淋巴水肿患者(18.9±14,p>0.05)更高。术前和术后每年的感染发作次数表明,与 ULL 患者相比,LLL 患者的感染率降低幅度更大(2.4±1.1 与 1.9±1.2,p<0.001)。

结论

VLNT 是治疗淋巴水肿患者的一种很有前途的手术选择。本研究表明,VLNT 可能对 ULL 和继发性淋巴水肿患者更有益。

相似文献

1
Comparisons in long-term clinical outcomes among patients with upper or lower extremity lymphedema treated with diverse vascularized lymph node transfer.比较不同血管化淋巴结转移术治疗上肢或下肢淋巴水肿患者的长期临床结局。
Microsurgery. 2020 Feb;40(2):130-136. doi: 10.1002/micr.30508. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes among different vascularized lymph node transfers: 6-year experience of a single center's approach to the treatment of lymphedema.不同带血管蒂淋巴结转移术的长期临床疗效比较:单中心治疗淋巴水肿方法的6年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;116(6):671-682. doi: 10.1002/jso.24730. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
Vascularized lymph node transfer for surgical treatments of upper versus lower extremity lymphedema.血管化淋巴结转移治疗上肢与下肢淋巴水肿的手术比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Jan;10(1):170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Comparing Different Donor Sites After Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer to the Lymphedematous Upper Limb: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.比较血管化淋巴结移植治疗上肢淋巴水肿后不同供区:临床结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jul 1;93(1):130-138. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003918.
5
Combined lymph node transfer and suction-assisted lipectomy in lymphedema treatment: A prospective study.联合淋巴结转移与吸脂辅助抽脂术治疗淋巴水肿:一项前瞻性研究。
Microsurgery. 2022 Jul;42(5):433-440. doi: 10.1002/micr.30855. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Postmastectomy upper limb lymphedema: Combined vascularized lymph node transfer and scar release with fat graft expedites surgical and patients' related outcomes. A retrospective comparative study.乳腺癌根治术后上肢淋巴水肿:联合带血管化淋巴结转移和脂肪移植的瘢痕松解术可加速手术和患者相关结局。一项回顾性对比研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jun;72(6):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
Impact of body mass index on long-term surgical outcomes of vascularized lymph node transfer in lymphedema patients.体重指数对淋巴水肿患者带血管淋巴结转移术长期手术效果的影响。
Gland Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):603-613. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.13.
8
Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer Improved Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema.血管化淋巴结转移改善老年继发性上肢淋巴水肿患者的结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7868-7878. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12035-9. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
9
Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Preliminary Report.血管化淋巴结转移治疗创伤后下肢淋巴水肿:初步报告
Indian J Plast Surg. 2022 Feb 28;55(1):97-101. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740520. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Improvement of the efficacy of vascularized lymph node transfer for lower-extremity lymphedema via a prefabricated lympho-venous shunt through lymphaticovenular anastomosis between the efferent lymphatic vessel and small vein in the elevated vascularized lymph node.通过在高位带血管淋巴结的输出淋巴管与小静脉之间进行淋巴管静脉吻合的预制淋巴静脉分流术,提高带血管淋巴结转移治疗下肢淋巴水肿的疗效。
Microsurgery. 2018 Mar;38(3):270-277. doi: 10.1002/micr.30234. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary LYmphedema Multidisciplinary Approach in Patients Affected by Primary Lower Extremity Lymphedema.原发性下肢淋巴水肿患者的原发性淋巴水肿多学科治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):5161. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175161.
2
[Cost comparison of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema].[慢性淋巴水肿保守治疗与手术治疗的成本比较]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jan;96(1):41-47. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02123-9. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Surgical treatment algorithm for breast cancer lymphedema-a systematic review.乳腺癌淋巴水肿的手术治疗算法——一项系统评价
Gland Surg. 2024 May 30;13(5):722-748. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-503. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Surgical Treatment for Primary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature.原发性淋巴水肿的外科治疗:文献系统评价
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 8;51(2):212-233. doi: 10.1055/a-2253-9859. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Distribution of Perigastric Station 4d Lymph Nodes in Vascularized Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Transfer: An Anatomic Study and Case Series.胃周站 4d 淋巴结在胃网膜血管化淋巴结转移中的分布:一项解剖学研究和病例系列。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3694-3704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15113-2. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
6
Surgical management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a narrative review of contemporary practices.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的外科治疗:当代实践的叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):418. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-292. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Vascularized lymph node flaps can survive on venous blood without an arterial inflow: an experimental model describing the dynamics of venous flow using indocyanine green angiography (With video).带血管蒂淋巴结皮瓣可在无动脉血流的情况下依靠静脉血存活:一种使用吲哚菁绿血管造影描述静脉血流动力学的实验模型(附视频)
Burns Trauma. 2023 Jul 19;11:tkad019. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad019. eCollection 2023.
8
Current Concepts in the Management of Primary Lymphedema.原发性淋巴水肿的治疗现状。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 6;59(5):894. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050894.
9
Optimizing Treatment of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Using Combined DIEP Flap and Lymphedema Surgery.采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣联合淋巴水肿手术优化乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的治疗
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 6;49(2):150-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744414. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Treatment of Early-Stage Gynecological Cancer-Related Lower Limb Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis-The Triple Incision Approach.淋巴静脉吻合术治疗妇科癌症相关下肢淋巴水肿的三重切口法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 1;58(5):631. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050631.