University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):537-549.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.043. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Interleukin 23 contributes to the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the effects of mirikizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the p19 subunit of interleukin 23, in a phase 2 study of patients with UC. METHODS: We performed a trial of the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in patients with moderate to severely active UC, enrolling patients from 14 countries from January 2016 through September 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given intravenous placebo (N = 63), mirikizumab 50 mg (N = 63) or 200 mg (N = 62) with exposure-based dosing, or mirikizumab 600 mg with fixed dosing (N = 61) at weeks 0, 4, and 8. Of assigned patients, 63% had prior exposure to a biologic agent. Clinical responders (decrease in 9-point Mayo score, including ≥2 points and ≥35% from baseline with either a decrease of rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1) at week 12 who had received mirikizumab were randomly assigned to groups that received maintenance treatment with mirikizumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks (N = 47) or every 12 weeks (N = 46). The primary endpoint was clinical remission (Mayo subscores of 0 for rectal bleeding, with 1-point decrease from baseline for stool frequency, and 0 or 1 for endoscopy) at week 12. A multiple testing procedure was used that began with the 600-mg dose group, and any nonsignificant comparison result ended the formal statistical testing procedure. RESULTS: At week 12, 15.9% (P = .066), 22.6% (P = .004), and 11.5% (P = .142) of patients in the 50-mg, 200-mg, and 600-mg groups achieved clinical remission, respectively, compared with 4.8% of patients given placebo. The primary endpoint was not significant (comparison to 600 mg, P > .05). Clinical responses occurred in 41.3% (P = .014), 59.7% (P < .001), and 49.2% (P = .001) of patients in the 50-mg, 200-mg, and 600-mg groups, respectively, compared with 20.6% of patients given placebo. At week 52, 46.8% of patients given subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg every 4 weeks and 37.0% given subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg every 12 weeks were in clinical remission. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of patients with UC, mirikizumab was effective in inducing a clinical response after 12 weeks. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal dose for induction of remission. Mirikizumab showed durable efficacy throughout the maintenance period. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT02589665.
背景与目的:白细胞介素 23 有助于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的发病机制。我们研究了针对白细胞介素 23 的 p19 亚单位的单克隆抗体米利珠单抗在中度至重度活动期 UC 患者的 2 期研究中的疗效和安全性。
方法:我们对来自 14 个国家的 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月期间的中度至重度活动期 UC 患者进行了米利珠单抗疗效和安全性的试验。患者随机分为静脉注射安慰剂组(N=63)、米利珠单抗 50mg 组(N=63)、米利珠单抗 200mg 组(暴露剂量组,N=62)和米利珠单抗 600mg 固定剂量组(N=61),分别在第 0、4 和 8 周给药。在分配的患者中,63%的患者曾接受过生物制剂治疗。在第 12 周时,达到临床应答(9 分 Mayo 评分下降,包括基线下降≥2 分和≥35%,并且直肠出血子评分下降≥1 或直肠出血子评分 0 或 1)的米利珠单抗治疗患者随机分为两组,分别接受米利珠单抗 200mg 皮下每 4 周(N=47)或每 12 周(N=46)维持治疗。主要终点是第 12 周的临床缓解(直肠出血 Mayo 子评分 0,粪便频率较基线下降 1 分,内镜下评分 0 或 1)。采用多重检测程序,从 600mg 剂量组开始,任何无显著性比较结果均结束正式的统计学检测程序。
结果:第 12 周时,50mg、200mg 和 600mg 组分别有 15.9%(P=.066)、22.6%(P=.004)和 11.5%(P=.142)的患者达到临床缓解,而安慰剂组为 4.8%。主要终点无统计学意义(与 600mg 比较,P>.05)。50mg、200mg 和 600mg 组分别有 41.3%(P=.014)、59.7%(P<.001)和 49.2%(P=.001)的患者出现临床应答,而安慰剂组为 20.6%。第 52 周时,46.8%接受每 4 周皮下注射米利珠单抗 200mg 的患者和 37.0%接受每 12 周皮下注射米利珠单抗 200mg 的患者达到临床缓解。
结论:在 UC 患者的随机试验中,米利珠单抗在 12 周后有效诱导临床应答。需要进一步的研究来确定诱导缓解的最佳剂量。米利珠单抗在整个维持期内显示出持久的疗效。Clinicaltrials.gov,编号 NCT02589665。
Gastroenterology. 2019-9-4
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022-1
Gastroenterology. 2019-11-9
N Engl J Med. 2023-6-29
Drugs. 2025-5-5
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-4-25