The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Health (London). 2021 Mar;25(2):214-230. doi: 10.1177/1363459319874100. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
The international literature shows that primary care is well placed to address mental health problems in young people, but that primary care professionals experience a range of challenges in this regard. In Denmark, young adults who have complex psychosocial problems, and who are not in education or work, cause political and academic concern. They are also in regular contact with their general practitioners, the Danish municipalities and psychiatric services. However, little is known about general practitioners' perspectives on caring for this vulnerable group of patients. In this article, we investigate how general practitioners' care work is shaped by the bureaucratic management of care in a complex infrastructure network comprising the general practitioners, psychiatry, the municipalities and the young adults. The analysis is based on interviews and focus groups with general practitioners, psychiatric nurses and social workers. We employ Tronto's concept of care and the concept of boundary work as a theoretical framework. We argue that general practitioners strive to provide care, but they are challenged by the following: contested diagnostic interpretations and the bureaucratic significance of diagnoses for the provision of care from psychiatry and the municipalities, systemic issues with handling intertwined social and mental health problems, and the young adults' difficulties with accessing and receiving available care.
国际文献表明,初级保健在解决年轻人的心理健康问题方面具有得天独厚的优势,但初级保健专业人员在这方面面临着一系列挑战。在丹麦,有复杂的社会心理问题、未接受教育或就业的年轻成年人引起了政治和学术界的关注。他们也与他们的全科医生、丹麦市政府和精神卫生服务机构保持着定期联系。然而,对于全科医生照顾这一弱势群体的观点知之甚少。在本文中,我们研究了全科医生的护理工作是如何受到包括全科医生、精神病学、市政府和年轻人在内的复杂基础设施网络中护理的官僚管理的影响。分析基于对全科医生、精神科护士和社会工作者的访谈和焦点小组。我们采用特隆特的关怀概念和边界工作概念作为理论框架。我们认为,全科医生努力提供护理,但他们面临以下挑战:有争议的诊断解释以及诊断对精神病学和市政府提供护理的官僚意义、处理相互交织的社会和心理健康问题的系统问题,以及年轻人在获得和接受现有护理方面的困难。