Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 Jan;28(1):66-78. doi: 10.1002/erv.2700. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
The current study examined the interpersonal model of binge eating, which posits that interpersonal problems lead to negative affect, which results in binge eating, over the course of two psychotherapy treatments (interpersonal psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy) in 162 adults with binge-eating disorder. A series of longitudinal simple mediation analyses preliminarily showed that treatment addresses the mechanisms of the interpersonal model of binge eating as theoretically proposed in predicting reductions in binge eating, the primary dependent variable, and the secondary dependent variables including global eating disorder psychopathology, shape concern, and weight concern, but not reductions in restraint or eating concern. Moderated mediation analyses did not fully support treatment differences, as changes in the mechanisms of the interpersonal model occurred in both treatments and suggest both treatments addressed negative affect and interpersonal precipitants of eating disorder symptomatology. Future research should replicate this study using variables that do not overlap in time to investigate causation of the model, and more generally, further examine theoretical treatment models and treatment mediators as this research could help improve efficacy of treatment for binge-eating disorder.
本研究检验了暴食症的人际模型,该模型假设人际问题会导致负面情绪,从而导致暴食症。该研究纳入了 162 名暴食症患者,他们接受了两种心理治疗(人际心理治疗和认知行为治疗)。一系列纵向简单中介分析初步表明,治疗方法针对暴食症人际模型的机制,正如理论上所提出的那样,可预测暴食行为这一主要因变量以及次要因变量(包括整体进食障碍心理病理学、体型担忧和体重担忧)的减少,但对抑制或进食担忧的减少没有预测作用。调节中介分析并不完全支持治疗差异,因为人际模型的机制变化发生在两种治疗中,这表明两种治疗都针对负面情绪和进食障碍症状的人际诱因。未来的研究应该使用时间上不重叠的变量重复这项研究,以调查该模型的因果关系,更广泛地说,进一步检验理论治疗模型和治疗中介,因为这项研究可以帮助提高暴食症治疗的效果。