Suppr超能文献

选择过多:瑞士泌尿外科医生手术治疗尿路结石的当前实践及对循证指南遵循情况的调查

Spoilt for Choice: A Survey of Current Practices of Surgical Urinary Stone Treatment and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines among Swiss Urologists.

作者信息

Betschart Patrick, Zumstein Valentin, Jichlinski Patrice, Herrmann Thomas R W, Knoll Thomas, Engeler Daniel Stephan, Müllhaupt Gautier, Schmid Hans-Peter, Abt Dominik

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland,

Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2019;103(3):357-363. doi: 10.1159/000502806. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Urologists have to master a variety of techniques to be able to offer the most appropriate surgical stone treatment for each individual patient. Therefore, we performed a survey among board-certified Swiss urologists to assess the availability of the different surgical methods, the current practices of surgical treatment of urolithiasis and the adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations in Switzerland.

METHODS

A 14-question survey assessed the working environment, equipment, perioperative settings and decision trees for specific stone scenarios. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to determine differences between frequencies of answers.

RESULTS

Hundred and five members of Swiss Urology (38%) completed the survey. All treatment modalities are available for the majority of respondents. Ureterorenoscopy was found to have the highest availability (100%) and was the preferred choice in the majority of stone scenarios. A high adherence to the guidelines was found for the treatment of ureteral stones <10 mm (100% proximal and distal), and >10 mm (69% proximal, 94% distal). All respondents answered in accordance with the guidelines regarding the treatment of middle and upper pole stones <10 mm, 10-20 mm and lower pole stones 10-20 mm. Guideline adherence was 99% for lower pole stones <10 mm, 78% for lower pole stones >20 mm, and 63% for middle/upper pole stones >20 mm.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides a detailed insight into current stone treatment practices in Switzerland. The full spectrum of urinary stone treatment options is available for the majority of Swiss urologists. The choice of treatment shows a high accordance with evidence-based guidelines and a preference for retrograde endoscopic surgery in the majority of stone scenarios.

摘要

引言

泌尿外科医生必须掌握多种技术,以便能够为每位患者提供最合适的手术结石治疗方案。因此,我们对瑞士获得委员会认证的泌尿外科医生进行了一项调查,以评估不同手术方法的可用性、目前尿石症的手术治疗实践以及瑞士对循证指南建议的遵循情况。

方法

一项包含14个问题的调查评估了工作环境、设备、围手术期设置以及针对特定结石情况的决策树。使用描述性统计和卡方检验分析数据,以确定答案频率之间的差异。

结果

瑞士泌尿外科协会的105名成员(38%)完成了调查。大多数受访者都能获得所有治疗方式。输尿管肾镜检查的可用性最高(100%),并且在大多数结石情况下是首选。对于直径<10mm的输尿管结石(近端和远端均为100%)以及直径>10mm的输尿管结石(近端69%,远端94%),发现对指南的遵循度很高。所有受访者对于直径<10mm、10 - 20mm的中、上极结石以及直径10 - 20mm的下极结石的治疗回答均符合指南。对于直径<10mm的下极结石,指南遵循度为99%;对于直径>20mm的下极结石,为78%;对于直径>20mm的中/上极结石,为63%。

结论

这项调查详细洞察了瑞士目前的结石治疗实践。大多数瑞士泌尿外科医生都能获得尿石症治疗的全系列选择。治疗选择显示出与循证指南高度一致,并且在大多数结石情况下更倾向于逆行内镜手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验