Suppr超能文献

与糖尿病控制结果相关的访视熵

Visit Entropy Associated with Diabetic Control Outcomes.

作者信息

Dilger Benjamin T, Gill Margaret C, Lenhart Jill G, Garrison Gregory M

机构信息

From Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 (BTD, MCG, GMG); Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI 55703 (JGL).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):739-745. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes place a large burden on the health care system and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A team-based multidisciplinary approach that organizes care to improve chronic disease management may actually decrease traditional continuity of care metrics. Visit entropy (VE) provides a novel measure of care organization produced by team-based approaches. Higher VE, reflecting more disorganized care, has been associated with more hospital readmissions. We hypothesized that higher VE was also associated with reduced adherence to the D5 quality criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 6590 adult diabetic patients in 5 established medical home practices was conducted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine if VE was associated with the dependent variable of D5 control. Separate models for usual provider continuity, continuity of care index, and sequence continuity were also constructed.

RESULTS

Less organized care with a higher VE was associated with decreased odds of D5 control (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.97). The other continuity measures were not significant. Age, education level, and initial HgA1c were significant covariates, but sex, race, endocrine consults, and Charlson comorbidity were not significant. The Number Needed to be Exposed to more organized care to produce 1 more controlled diabetic was 32.5.

CONCLUSIONS

More organized care reflected by a lower VE is associated with improved odds of D5 diabetic control. VE represents a better measure of care organization in team-based medical home environments than traditional continuity of care metrics.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病等慢性病给医疗保健系统带来了沉重负担,并与发病率和死亡率的增加相关。一种基于团队的多学科方法来组织护理以改善慢性病管理,实际上可能会降低传统的护理连续性指标。就诊熵(VE)提供了一种由基于团队的方法产生的护理组织的新度量。较高的VE反映护理更无序,与更多的医院再入院相关。我们假设较高的VE也与对D5质量标准的依从性降低有关。

方法

对5个已建立的医疗之家实践中的6590名成年糖尿病患者进行了回顾性研究。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定VE是否与D5控制的因变量相关。还构建了关于通常提供者连续性、护理连续性指数和顺序连续性的单独模型。

结果

VE较高表明护理组织性较差,与D5控制的几率降低相关(优势比=0.88;95%置信区间,0.80至0.97)。其他连续性指标不显著。年龄、教育水平和初始糖化血红蛋白是显著的协变量,但性别、种族、内分泌会诊和查尔森合并症不显著。为使1名糖尿病患者得到更好控制而需要接受更有组织护理的人数为32.5。

结论

较低的VE所反映的更有组织的护理与D5糖尿病控制几率的改善相关。在基于团队的医疗之家环境中,VE比传统的护理连续性指标更能衡量护理组织情况。

相似文献

1
Visit Entropy Associated with Diabetic Control Outcomes.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):739-745. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190026.
2
Visit Entropy Associated with Hospital Readmission Rates.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jan 2;30(1):63-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160186.
3
Continuity in a VA patient-centered medical home reduces emergency department visits.
PLoS One. 2014 May 27;9(5):e96356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096356. eCollection 2014.
7
Continuity of care for newly diagnosed diabetic patients: A population-based study.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221327. eCollection 2019.
9
10
Self-efficacy remains a vital factor in reducing the risk of dialysis in type 2 diabetes care.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26644. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026644.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuity of Care: A Primer for Family Medicine Residencies.
Fam Med. 2024 Feb;56(2):76-83. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.913197. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Clinician Care Team Composition and Health Care Utilization.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Apr 8;5(2):338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Measures of care fragmentation: Mathematical insights from population genetics.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):318-327. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13263. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S103-S123. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S010.
3
Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1529-1539. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804988. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
4
11. Older Adults: .
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S119-S125. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S011.
5
Visit Entropy Associated with Hospital Readmission Rates.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jan 2;30(1):63-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160186.
6
Evaluation of PCMH Model Adoption on Teamwork and Impact on Patient Access and Safety.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Apr;8(2):77-82. doi: 10.1177/2150131916678496. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
8
Health outcomes in diabetics measured with Minnesota Community Measurement quality metrics.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Dec 16;8:1-8. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S71726. eCollection 2015.
9
The lifetime cost of diabetes and its implications for diabetes prevention.
Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2557-64. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2484.
10
Continuity and the costs of care for chronic disease.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):742-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.245.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验