Suppr超能文献

消费者对牛肉、马肉、鹿肉和野牛的感官比较,使用偏好属性 elicitation 和 Check-All-That-Apply 方法。

Consumer Sensory Comparisons Among Beef, Horse, Elk, and Bison Using Preferred Attributes Elicitation and Check-All-That-Apply Methods.

机构信息

Dept. of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, Univ. of Alberta, 4-10 Agriculture Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P5, Canada.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2019 Oct;84(10):3009-3017. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14780. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Abstract

Despite their nutritional benefits, consumption of red meat from alternative sources such as bison, elk, and horse is low when compared to beef. Sensory attributes and drivers of liking were identified for these meats using the Preferred Attributes Elicitation (PAE) and Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) methods. For the PAE study, 25 panelists evaluated beef, horse, bison, and elk meats in three different group sessions (n = 7, 7, and 11), whereas 63 panelists participated in the CATA study. Consumers in both PAE and CATA studies associated horse meat with dry and fibrous appearance, whereas beef was associated with meaty/beefy flavor and aroma: bison with metallic and livery aroma and intense aftertaste and elk meat with livery, fishy, metallic flavor, musky aroma, and bloody aftertaste. Penalty analysis on the CATA data identified similar drivers of meat liking as the PAE groups. The attributes were juiciness, meaty/beefy aroma, tender texture, meaty/beefy flavor, and mild flavor and aroma. Attributes with significantly negative mean impact on liking were dryness, tough texture, livery flavor, and aftertaste. Association of these attributes with horse and elk meats has implication on drivers of dislike for these meat types. Cluster analysis identified a small group of consumers with preference for horse and elk meats, and this may present niche market opportunities for these meat types. Results showed that the PAE method was comparable to CATA for the evaluation of meat from different species and for identification of drivers of liking and that both methods are effective for meat sensory characterization. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Lean red meat from unconventional sources such as elk, bison, and horse has unique sensory attributes that may influence acceptance. This study characterized the sensory attributes of these meats and their impact on liking using two rapid consumer descriptive profiling methods-PAE and CATA. Undesirable flavor and aftertaste attributes were identified as the major drivers of disliking for these unconventional meats. Both methods gave similar description of the samples, thus confirming the suitability of PAE for descriptive meat profiling by consumer panels.

摘要

尽管这些肉类具有营养价值,但与牛肉相比,野牛、麋鹿和马等替代来源的红肉类的消费仍然较低。本研究使用偏好属性 elicitation(PAE)和全选适切性评估(CATA)方法,确定了这些肉类的感官属性和喜好驱动因素。在 PAE 研究中,25 名品尝小组成员在三个不同的小组会议中评估了牛肉、马肉、野牛和麋鹿肉(n = 7、7 和 11),而 63 名品尝小组成员参加了 CATA 研究。PAE 和 CATA 研究中的消费者都将马肉与干燥和纤维状的外观联系在一起,而牛肉则与肉质/牛肉味和香气相关:野牛与金属和马具气味和强烈的余味有关,麋鹿肉则具有马具味、鱼腥味、金属味、麝香气味和血腥余味。对 CATA 数据的惩罚分析确定了与 PAE 组相似的肉类喜好驱动因素。这些属性包括多汁性、肉质/牛肉香气、嫩度、肉质/牛肉味和温和的味道和香气。对喜好有显著负面影响的属性包括干燥、坚韧的质地、马具味和余味。这些属性与马肉和鹿肉的联系对这些肉类类型的不喜欢驱动因素有影响。聚类分析确定了一小部分喜欢马肉和鹿肉的消费者群体,这可能为这些肉类类型提供了利基市场机会。结果表明,PAE 方法与 CATA 一样,可用于评估不同物种的肉类,并确定喜好的驱动因素,并且这两种方法都可有效地进行肉类感官特征描述。 实际应用:来自非传统来源的瘦红肉,如麋鹿、野牛和马,具有独特的感官属性,可能会影响接受度。本研究使用两种快速消费者描述性分析方法(PAE 和 CATA),对这些肉类的感官属性及其对喜好的影响进行了描述。不良的风味和余味属性被确定为这些非传统肉类不被喜欢的主要驱动因素。两种方法对样品的描述相似,从而证实了 PAE 方法对消费者小组进行描述性肉类分析的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验