Suppr超能文献

在进行改良版的 Halstead 手指敲击测试时的运动记录:年龄、性别和教育的影响。

Kinematic recordings while performing a modified version of the Halstead Finger Tapping Test: Age, sex, and education effects.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Department of Neuroscientific Research, SARAH Network Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Feb;42(1):42-54. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1665170. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

Abstract

: This study attempts to demonstrate that kinematic recordings of finger movements help explain the well-known effects of age, education, and sex on the Halstead Finger Tapping Test (HFTT). : High-speed kinematic recordings were obtained on 107 healthy adults (ages 21 to 80 years) while they performed a modified version of the Halstead Finger Tapping Test (HFTT). The number of "valid" taps and "invalid" taps (i.e., lever movements that did not produce an increase in the mechanical number count), tapping speed variability, "learning" and "fatigue" effects was obtained. : Previous age, education, and sex effects were replicated. Males had faster start and stop times when finger tapping and these measures correlated with the number of valid taps per 10 s. Educational level correlated with start times, not stop times. Age correlated only with the number of valid taps. Variability of tapping movements correlated with the number of invalid taps, but not valid taps. Females had more invalid taps than males. Fatigue and learning effects were independent of the person's age, education, and sex. : Kinematic recordings of finger tapping help explain the well-known age, education, and sex effects on finger tapping speeds. A modified method of administrating the HFTT is also introduced to assess fatigue and learning effects while performing this task.

摘要

本研究试图证明手指运动的运动学记录有助于解释年龄、教育和性别对 Halstead 手指敲击测试(HFTT)的已知影响。

对 107 名健康成年人(年龄 21 至 80 岁)进行了高速运动学记录,他们在进行 Halstead 手指敲击测试(HFTT)的修改版本时。获得了“有效”敲击次数和“无效”敲击次数(即,未产生机械计数增加的杠杆运动)、敲击速度变化、“学习”和“疲劳”效应。

先前的年龄、教育和性别效应得到了复制。男性在手指敲击时具有更快的开始和停止时间,这些措施与每 10 秒的有效敲击次数相关。教育水平与开始时间相关,而不是停止时间。年龄仅与有效敲击次数相关。敲击运动的变异性与无效敲击次数相关,但与有效敲击次数无关。女性的无效敲击次数多于男性。疲劳和学习效应与个体的年龄、教育和性别无关。

手指敲击的运动学记录有助于解释手指敲击速度的已知年龄、教育和性别影响。还介绍了一种修改后的 HFTT 管理方法,以评估执行此任务时的疲劳和学习效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验