Suppr超能文献

孕期药物筛查:尿液检测杯效果良好。

Drug screening during pregnancy: Urine dip cups measure up.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107461. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substance use during pregnancy is a major medical and public health concern. Determination of the most appropriate screening protocol remains a clinical conundrum. Interviews and/or laboratory drug screens may be costly, inaccurate, and are frequently inadequate to identify patterns of substance use for a given population or geographic area. We compared commercially available urine "dip cup" toxicology screens obtained in the clinic to university hospital drug toxicology results.

METHODS

267 observed urine samples were collected from pregnant women with known substance use disorders enrolled in a specialized treatment program that included access to buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. Each urine sample was tested by commercial dip cup with temperature confirmation and then sent to the university hospital laboratory for analyses. The number of substances detected and cost for each screening method were compared.

RESULTS

Uniformly, the dip cup had comparable detection of amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, methadone, opiates, and tetrahydrocannabinol to the university hospital laboratory with the exception of benzodiazepines. In addition, the dip cup detected use of buprenorphine (a commonly misused opiate receptor ligand not included in the hospital screen) and was significantly less expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercially available urine dip cups are cost-effective, equally comparable to hospital based screening, and provide 'real time' results germane to clinical care and treatment planning.

摘要

背景

孕期物质使用是一个主要的医学和公共卫生问题。确定最合适的筛查方案仍然是一个临床难题。访谈和/或实验室药物筛查可能既昂贵又不准确,并且通常不足以识别特定人群或地理区域的物质使用模式。我们比较了在诊所获得的商业上可用的尿液“浸杯”毒物筛查与大学医院的药物毒理学结果。

方法

从参加专门治疗计划的已知物质使用障碍的孕妇中收集了 267 个观察尿液样本,该计划包括使用丁丙诺啡药物辅助治疗。每个尿液样本都通过具有温度确认的商业浸杯进行测试,然后送到大学医院实验室进行分析。比较了每种筛查方法检测到的物质数量和成本。

结果

除了苯二氮䓬类药物外,浸杯与大学医院实验室对安非他命、巴比妥酸盐、可卡因、美沙酮、阿片类药物和四氢大麻酚的检测结果具有可比性。此外,浸杯还检测到丁丙诺啡的使用(一种通常被滥用的阿片受体配体,不包括在医院筛查中),且价格明显更低。

结论

市售的尿液浸杯具有成本效益,与基于医院的筛查同样可比,并提供与临床护理和治疗计划相关的“实时”结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验