Singh Aditi, Bhagat Milind, George Susan V, Gorthi Ramya, Chaturvedula Chandrakanth
Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Hospital, Worcester, USA.
Internal Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.
Cureus. 2019 Jul 10;11(7):e5118. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5118.
Introduction Mortality from sepsis is decreasing in recent years owing to improved quality of care, targeted programs, and the implementation of sepsis bundles. This has led to an increased pool of sepsis survivors at risk of readmissions. Studies have shown that these sepsis readmissions are common and expensive. The factors associated with these readmissions remain elusive and have incited a lot of research in recent years. The 30-day sepsis readmission rate is increasingly being used as a quality metric for hospitals. A conducted a retrospective chart review analysis of patients admitted with sepsis to find factors affecting the 30-day readmissions of sepsis survivors. Methods Patients admitted to our hospital either on the medical-surgical floor or in the intensive care unit (ICU) with an administrative coding for sepsis between January 2014 to November 2015 were identified. A literature search, as well as expert opinion, was considered for the list of factors to be studied, including age, sex, residence on admission, length of stay, getting hemodialysis, hospitalization in the prior year, presence of acute kidney injury (AKI), source of sepsis, discharge disposition, receipt of red blood cell (RBC) products, and route of antibiotics on discharge. A univariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between the above-mentioned variables and sepsis readmission. Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were used to compute the multivariate regression analysis along, with adjusted OR and their 95% CI. Results A total of 1297 patients were identified with sepsis. Of these, 1068 patients met inclusion criteria. The readmission rate in our study population was 19.19%, and 52% of the readmissions were secondary to an infectious cause. After controlling for the effect of all the potential confounders, the factors that showed a positive association with readmissions were hospitalizations in the year prior to the index hospitalization and discharge to either nursing home or short-term rehab. The requirement of the intensive care unit was not associated with increased readmission. High hemoglobin on discharge was associated with a reduced chance of readmission. Conclusions Readmissions after sepsis hospitalization are common and mostly caused by infections. Several factors associated with index sepsis hospitalization can be associated with readmissions. Some of these factors are modifiable and more research is needed to see if these readmissions can be prevented.
引言 由于护理质量的提高、针对性项目以及脓毒症集束化治疗的实施,近年来脓毒症死亡率有所下降。这导致脓毒症幸存者再入院风险人群增加。研究表明,这些脓毒症再入院情况很常见且费用高昂。与这些再入院相关的因素仍然难以捉摸,近年来引发了大量研究。30天脓毒症再入院率越来越多地被用作医院的质量指标。开展了一项对脓毒症入院患者的回顾性病历审查分析,以找出影响脓毒症幸存者30天再入院的因素。
方法 确定2014年1月至2015年11月期间在我院内科 - 外科病房或重症监护病房(ICU)入院且行政编码为脓毒症的患者。对于要研究的因素列表,考虑了文献检索以及专家意见,包括年龄、性别、入院时居住地、住院时间、接受血液透析、上一年住院情况、急性肾损伤(AKI)的存在、脓毒症来源、出院处置、接受红细胞(RBC)制品以及出院时抗生素使用途径。进行单变量二元逻辑回归分析以测试上述变量与脓毒症再入院之间的关联。单变量分析中有统计学意义的变量用于计算多变量回归分析以及调整后的OR及其95%置信区间。
结果 共确定1297例脓毒症患者。其中,1068例患者符合纳入标准。我们研究人群的再入院率为19.19%,52%的再入院是由感染引起的。在控制了所有潜在混杂因素的影响后,与再入院呈正相关的因素是索引住院前一年的住院情况以及出院到养老院或短期康复机构。重症监护病房的需求与再入院增加无关。出院时高血红蛋白与再入院机会减少有关。
结论 脓毒症住院后的再入院很常见,主要由感染引起。与索引脓毒症住院相关的几个因素可能与再入院有关。其中一些因素是可改变的,需要更多研究来确定这些再入院是否可以预防。