2119 Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Bioessays. 2019 Oct;41(10):e1900061. doi: 10.1002/bies.201900061. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Three-legged animals do not exist today and such an animal is not found in the fossil record. Which constraints operate to result in the lack of a triped phenotype? Consideration of animal locomotion and robotic studies suggests that physical constraints would not prevent a triped from being functional or advantageous. As is reviewed here, the strongest constraint on the evolution of a triped is phylogenetic: namely, the early genetic adoption of a bilaterally symmetrical body plan occurring before the advent of limbs. Presumably, this would greatly constrain any three-legged animal from ever evolving. Tripedalism is employed only by a few animals, but many use a tripod stance while engaged in a variety of activities. Because terms are often used interchangeably in the literature, a standardization of locomotion terminology is proposed. Understanding the constraints behind "forbidden" phenotypes forces us to confront gaps in our evolutionary understanding of which we may be unaware.
今天不存在三足动物,化石记录中也没有发现这样的动物。是什么限制导致了三足表型的缺失?考虑到动物的运动方式和机器人研究,物理限制不会阻止三足动物的功能或优势。正如这里所回顾的,对三足动物进化的最强限制是系统发生学上的:即在肢体出现之前,早期遗传采用了左右对称的身体计划。据推测,这将极大地限制任何三足动物的进化。三足动物仅被少数动物采用,但许多动物在从事各种活动时都会采用三脚架姿势。由于术语在文献中经常互换使用,因此建议对运动术语进行标准化。理解“被禁止”表型背后的限制迫使我们面对我们可能没有意识到的进化理解中的差距。