Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
International Psycho-Oncology Society Fear of Cancer Recurrence Special Interest Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2899-2915. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00572. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significantly distressing problem that affects a substantial number of patients with and survivors of cancer; however, the overall efficacy of available psychological interventions on FCR remains unknown. We therefore evaluated this in the present systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched key electronic databases to identify trials that evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on FCR among patients with and survivors of cancer. Controlled trials were subjected to meta-analysis, and the moderating influence of study characteristics on the effect were examined. Overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Open trials were narratively reviewed to explore ongoing developments in the field (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42017076514).
A total of 23 controlled trials (21 randomized controlled trials) and nine open trials were included. Small effects (Hedges's ) were found both at postintervention ( = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.46; < .001) and at follow-up ( = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.40; .001). Effects at postintervention of contemporary cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs; = 0.42) were larger than those of traditional CBTs ( = 0.24; β = .22; 95% CI, .04 to .41; = .018). At follow-up, larger effects were associated with shorter time to follow-up (β = -.01; 95% CI, -.01 to -.00; = .027) and group-based formats (β = .18; 95% CI, .01 to .36; = .041). A GRADE evaluation indicated evidence of moderate strength for effects of psychological intervention for FCR.
Psychological interventions for FCR revealed a small but robust effect at postintervention, which was largely maintained at follow-up. Larger postintervention effects were found for contemporary CBTs that were focused on processes of cognition-for example, worry, rumination, and attentional bias-rather than the content, and aimed to change the way in which the individual relates to his or her inner experiences. Future trials could investigate how to further optimize and tailor interventions to individual patients' FCR presentation.
对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR)是一个严重困扰患者及其癌症幸存者的问题;然而,现有心理干预措施对 FCR 的总体疗效尚不清楚。因此,本研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们检索了主要的电子数据库,以确定评估癌症患者和幸存者的心理干预对 FCR 影响的试验。对对照试验进行荟萃分析,并检验研究特征对疗效的调节作用。使用 GRADE 系统评估总体证据质量。对开放性试验进行叙述性综述,以探索该领域的进展情况(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017076514)。
共纳入 23 项对照试验(21 项随机对照试验)和 9 项开放性试验。干预后( = 0.33;95%CI,0.20 至 0.46;.001)和随访时( = 0.28;95%CI,0.17 至 0.40;.001)均发现小效应。当代认知行为疗法(CBT)的干预后效果( = 0.42)大于传统 CBT( = 0.24;β=.22;95%CI,.04 至.41; =.018)。在随访时,与较短的随访时间(β= -.01;95%CI, -.01 至 -.00; =.027)和基于小组的格式(β=.18;95%CI,.01 至.36; =.041)相关的较大效果。GRADE 评估表明,心理干预对 FCR 的疗效具有中等强度的证据。
针对 FCR 的心理干预在干预后显示出微弱但稳健的效果,在随访时基本保持。对于关注认知过程(例如,担忧、沉思和注意力偏差)而非内容的当代 CBT,干预后的效果更大,目的是改变个体与其内在体验的关系方式。未来的试验可以研究如何进一步优化和定制干预措施,以适应个体患者的 FCR 表现。