Suppr超能文献

抗原性与独特型的观点

Perspectives on antigenicity and idiotypy.

作者信息

Kieber-Emmons T, Getzoff E, Köhler H

机构信息

Department of Molecular Immunology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263.

出版信息

Int Rev Immunol. 1987 Jul;2(4):339-56. doi: 10.3109/08830188709044761.

Abstract

The recent crystal determination of a lysozyme-antilysozyme complex provides a three-dimensional prototype of the manner in which contacts in idiotype-anti-idiotype interactions may be realized. Such interactions can be approximated by two complementary "flat" surfaces. Each IDR (autoantigenic locus) location might provide a particular recognition feature between two interacting partners. The combinatorial manner in which IDR domains are recognized by anti-idiotypic antibodies describe the repertoire of private and public (crossreactive) idiotopes of an antibody. Several interesting features emerge from consideration of the Ab contact residues in the crystal structure. First, framework residues are implicated in contacting the antigen: Thr 30 (FR1) of the heavy chain and Tyr 49 (FR2) of the kappa light chain. Both of these residues lie within predicted IDRs. Framework regions have recently been suggested to be involved in several anti-idiotypic systems, although such regions have, in the past, been disregarded based solely upon sequence analysis. The surface variability analysis, which identifies the repertoire of complementary interacting surfaces, depicts the immunoglobulin as having more variability than generally thought. This variability may also extend to T cell receptors since T cell chains express an extensive surface variable repertoire similar to that of the immunoglobulin light chains (Kieber-Emmons and Köhler, unpublished). Second, the D region plays a critical role in the generation of the antilysozyme combining sites. Similarly, the D segment makes up the largest component of an IDR. Third, while the CDR3 of the heavy chain contributes most to the antibody-lysozyme complex it is not the most surface-exposed (see Novotny, this issue). Nevertheless, surface variability analysis indicates that this region is generally immunodominant which is also observed experimentally. Together, these results indicate that perhaps certain IDR regions are intrinsically more antigenic. Idiotypic structures must be accessible for antibody recognition and binding. From a structural viewpoint, a single antibody molecule has a continuum or several different combining sites. Subsequently, a single residue can be contained in several overlapping idiotypic determinants. Surface variability analysis suggests that the hypervariable regions of Igs provide a diverse idiotope repertoire that can be utilized for binding. Monoclonal antibodies have been shown to have multiple specificities and this capacity for multiple binding is also intrinsic to the definitions that have emerged for anti-idiotypic antibodies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

最近对溶菌酶 - 抗溶菌酶复合物的晶体结构测定,提供了一个三维原型,展示了独特型 - 抗独特型相互作用中可能实现的接触方式。这种相互作用可以由两个互补的“平坦”表面来近似。每个个体独特决定簇区域(自身抗原位点)的位置,可能在两个相互作用的伙伴之间提供特定的识别特征。抗独特型抗体识别个体独特决定簇区域的组合方式,描述了抗体的个体独特型和公共(交叉反应)独特型的全部组成。从晶体结构中抗体接触残基的角度考虑,出现了几个有趣的特征。首先,构架残基参与了与抗原的接触:重链的苏氨酸30(FR1)和κ轻链的酪氨酸49(FR2)。这两个残基都位于预测的个体独特决定簇区域内。构架区最近被认为参与了几个抗独特型系统,尽管过去仅基于序列分析而忽略了这些区域。表面变异性分析确定了互补相互作用表面的全部组成,表明免疫球蛋白具有比一般认为的更多的变异性。这种变异性也可能扩展到T细胞受体,因为T细胞链表达的广泛表面可变全部组成与免疫球蛋白轻链相似(Kieber - Emmons和Köhler,未发表)。其次,D区在抗溶菌酶结合位点的产生中起关键作用。同样,D片段构成了个体独特决定簇区域的最大组成部分。第三,虽然重链的互补决定区3对抗体 - 溶菌酶复合物贡献最大,但它不是最暴露于表面的(见本期Novotny的文章)。然而,表面变异性分析表明该区域通常是免疫显性的,这也在实验中观察到。总之,这些结果表明,也许某些个体独特决定簇区域本质上更具抗原性。独特型结构必须可被抗体识别和结合。从结构观点来看,单个抗体分子有一个连续的或几个不同的结合位点。随后,单个残基可以包含在几个重叠的独特型决定簇中。表面变异性分析表明,免疫球蛋白的高变区提供了可用于结合的多样独特型全部组成。单克隆抗体已被证明具有多种特异性,这种多重结合能力也是抗独特型抗体定义中固有的。(摘要截短至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验