Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Apr;18(2):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00511-5.
Although suicide-prevention campaigns have been implemented in numerous countries, Canada has yet to implement a strategy nationally. This is the first study to examine the cost utility of the implementation of a multidimensional suicide-prevention program that combines several interventions over a 50-year time horizon.
We used Markov modeling to capture the dynamic changes to health status and estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained over a 50-year period for Ontario residents for a suicide-prevention strategy compared to no intervention. The strategy consisted of a package of interventions geared towards preventing suicide including a public health awareness campaign, increased identification of individuals at risk, increased training of primary-care physicians, and increased treatment post-suicide attempt. Four health states were captured by the Markov model: (1) alive and no recent suicide attempt; (2) suicide attempt; (3) death by suicide; (4) death (other than suicide). Analyses were from a societal perspective where all costs, irrespective of payer, were included. We used a probabilistic analysis to test the robustness of the model results to both variation and uncertainty in model parameters.
Over the 50-year period, the suicide-prevention campaign had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $18,853 (values are in Canadian dollars) per QALY gained. In all one-way sensitivity analyses, the ICER remained under $50,000/QALY. In the probabilistic analysis, there was a probability of 94.8% that the campaign was cost effective at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY (95% confidence interval of ICER probabilistic distribution: 2650-62,375). Among the current population, the intervention was predicted to result in the prevention of 4454 suicides after 50 years (1033 by year 10; 2803 by year 25). A healthcare payer perspective sensitivity analysis showed an ICER of $21,096.14/QALY.
These findings demonstrate that a suicide-prevention campaign in Ontario is very likely a cost-effective intervention to reduce the incidence of suicide and suggest suicide-prevention campaigns are likely to be cost effective for some other Canadian provinces and potentially other countries.
尽管许多国家已经实施了预防自杀的活动,但加拿大尚未在全国范围内实施一项战略。这是第一项研究,旨在考察在 50 年时间框架内实施结合了多种干预措施的多维预防自杀计划的成本效用。
我们使用马尔可夫模型来捕捉健康状况的动态变化,并估算安大略省居民预防自杀策略与不干预相比在 50 年内每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本。该策略包括一系列旨在预防自杀的干预措施,包括开展公共卫生宣传活动、增加对高危人群的识别、增加初级保健医生的培训以及增加自杀未遂后的治疗。马尔可夫模型捕捉到了四个健康状态:(1)存活且最近无自杀企图;(2)自杀企图;(3)自杀死亡;(4)死亡(非自杀)。分析从全社会角度出发,包含了所有支付方的所有成本。我们使用概率分析来测试模型结果对模型参数变化和不确定性的稳健性。
在 50 年内,预防自杀活动的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一个质量调整生命年 18853 加元(以加元计价)。在所有单因素敏感性分析中,ICER 均低于 50000 加元/QALY。在概率分析中,该活动在 50000 加元/QALY 的意愿支付水平下具有 94.8%的成本效益概率(95%置信区间的 ICER 概率分布:2650-62375)。在当前人群中,预计该干预措施在 50 年后将预防 4454 例自杀(第 10 年预防 1033 例,第 25 年预防 2803 例)。从医疗保健支付方的角度进行敏感性分析,结果显示 ICER 为 21096.14 加元/QALY。
这些发现表明,安大略省的预防自杀活动很可能是一种减少自杀发生率的具有成本效益的干预措施,并表明预防自杀活动对加拿大其他一些省份和其他国家可能具有成本效益。