同行评审小组在国际持续专业发展文献中处于什么位置？
Where do Peer Review Groups fit in the international Continuing Professional Development literature?
作者信息
Karageorge Aspasia, Lancaster Jeanette, Prager Shirley, Nash Louise
机构信息
Research Associate, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Consultant Psychiatrist, Private Practice, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
出版信息
Australas Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;27(6):651-654. doi: 10.1177/1039856219871880. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
OBJECTIVES
To describe what is reported in the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) literature on small group learning formats in medicine, including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) CPD Peer Review Groups (PRGs).
METHOD
A literature review of international peer-reviewed publications in relation to the use of small group learning formats for CPD in medicine.
RESULTS
Small groups are commonly used as a learning format in medical CPD, primarily in general practice, but are little researched. Such groups take differing forms and they are valued by participants for a range of purposes, having effects on professionalism, clinical performance and doctors' wellbeing.
CONCLUSION
We believe that the contribution of these groups to medical CPD should be further explored. To this end, this review forms the first part of a research project focussing on the RANZCP PRG model used by Australian and New Zealand psychiatrists.
目的
描述医学继续职业发展（CPD）文献中关于医学领域小组学习形式的报道，包括澳大利亚和新西兰皇家精神科医学院（RANZCP）的CPD同行评审小组（PRG）。
方法
对国际同行评审出版物中关于在医学CPD中使用小组学习形式的文献进行综述。
结果
小组学习在医学CPD中是常用的学习形式，主要用于全科医疗，但相关研究较少。这些小组形式各异，参与者出于多种目的重视它们，对专业素养、临床绩效和医生的幸福感都有影响。
结论
我们认为应进一步探索这些小组对医学CPD的贡献。为此，本综述构成了一个研究项目的第一部分，该项目聚焦于澳大利亚和新西兰精神科医生所采用的RANZCP PRG模式。
Zotero 插件