Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science.
Department of Psychology.
Personal Disord. 2020 Jul;11(4):249-259. doi: 10.1037/per0000358. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
Studies examining the associations between categorical assessments of eating disorders (ED) and personality have produced some inconsistent findings. The present study aimed to clarify these inconsistencies by implementing a dimensional approach when assessing ED behaviors and personality psychopathology. Associations between pathological personality trait facets and heterogeneous ED behaviors (i.e., restriction, compensatory behaviors, and binge eating) were examined. Participants were 570 community adults (247 women) recruited through Mechanical Turk. The Personality Inventory for (PID-5), was used to assess the pathological personality trait facets. Items from two validated eating pathology scales were used to measure ED behaviors. Two structural equation models-an exploratory model and a theoretical model-were tested for each ED behavior. The exploratory model allowed all PID-5 personality facets to predict the ED behaviors. The theoretical models estimated paths from specific PID-5 facets to the ED behaviors. The theoretical model was an attempt to corroborate previous literature where distinct personality profiles have distinguished individuals with different EDs. The theoretical model was considered the most parsimonious model for all three ED behaviors, and each theoretical model revealed a pattern of significant associations with personality trait facets-restriction was significantly associated with higher rigid perfectionism, and binge eating was significantly associated with higher impulsivity and anxiousness. Only the significant associations with binge eating remained statistically significant when men and women were examined separately. When a dimensional model is applied, significant relationships emerge between heterogeneous ED behaviors and PID-5 trait facets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
研究检查了饮食失调(ED)的分类评估与人格之间的关联,得出了一些不一致的发现。本研究旨在通过在评估 ED 行为和人格病理学时采用维度方法来澄清这些不一致。检查了病理人格特质特征与异质 ED 行为(即限制、补偿行为和暴食)之间的关联。参与者是通过 Mechanical Turk 招募的 570 名社区成年人(247 名女性)。使用人格障碍诊断问卷 5 版(PID-5)评估病理人格特质特征。使用两个经过验证的饮食病理学量表的项目来衡量 ED 行为。为每种 ED 行为测试了两个结构方程模型——探索性模型和理论模型。探索性模型允许所有 PID-5 人格特征预测 ED 行为。理论模型估计了特定 PID-5 特征与 ED 行为的路径。理论模型试图证实先前的文献,即不同的人格特征区分了具有不同 ED 的个体。理论模型被认为是所有三种 ED 行为最简约的模型,每个理论模型都揭示了与人格特质特征的显著关联模式——限制与更高的僵化完美主义显著相关,暴食与更高的冲动性和焦虑显著相关。只有当分别检查男性和女性时,暴食的显著关联才具有统计学意义。当应用维度模型时,异质 ED 行为与 PID-5 特质特征之间会出现显著关系。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。