Cova Félix, Garcia Felipe, Oyanadel Cristian, Villagran Loreto, Páez Dario, Inostroza Carolina
Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Comunicación, Universidad Santo Tomas, Concepción, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01943. eCollection 2019.
Reflecting on negative emotional experiences can be adaptive but it can also maintain or intensify detrimental emotional states. Which factors determine whether reflection can have one consequence or another is unclear. This study focused on two research programs that have concentrated on this topic in the last decades: processing-mode theory (PMT) and self-distancing theory (SDT). The article described and contrasted both programs and their findings. The promising results that PMT and SDT have achieved in identifying the differences between the forms of adaptive and maladaptive reflection are highlighted. Likewise, the disconcerting contradictions observed between both programs that make integrating the findings difficult are indicated. The PMT states that adaptive reflection is concrete, and it is focused on the how of the experience. The SDT states that adaptive reflection is self-distanced and focused on the global meaning of the experience. The article finishes by indicating possible explanations for these apparent contradictions and outlines the challenges to be solved to improve comprehension of the topic.
反思负面情绪体验可能具有适应性,但也可能维持或加剧有害的情绪状态。哪些因素决定反思会产生哪种结果尚不清楚。本研究聚焦于过去几十年中专注于该主题的两个研究项目:加工模式理论(PMT)和自我疏离理论(SDT)。本文描述并对比了这两个项目及其研究结果。突出了PMT和SDT在识别适应性和适应不良反思形式之间差异方面取得的有前景的成果。同样,也指出了两个项目之间令人不安的矛盾之处,这些矛盾使得整合研究结果变得困难。PMT指出适应性反思是具体的,且专注于体验的方式。SDT指出适应性反思是自我疏离的,且专注于体验的整体意义。文章最后指出了这些明显矛盾的可能解释,并概述了为提高对该主题的理解而有待解决的挑战。