Suppr超能文献

全科医生与心理学家的合作:心理学家视角下的不满——一项横断面研究。

Collaboration Between GPs and Psychologists: Dissatisfaction from the Psychologists' Perspective-A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

General Practice Department, Toulouse III University, 133 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.

UMR1027 Inserm - Toulouse III University, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31000, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Jun;27(2):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09663-x.

Abstract

Collaborative mental health practices in primary care significantly enhances patients' health. Collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and psychologists could improve non-drug mental care. Little is known of psychologists' perception of GPs and their collaboration. This study aimed to assess the quality of collaboration between GPs and psychologists from the psychologists' perspective and to identify factors associated with satisfactory collaboration. A questionnaire was sent by post to all private psychologists in a region of France in February, 2017. We carried out descriptive and multivariate analysis of factors associated with satisfactory collaboration. The response rate was 38% (n = 434 out of 1128). Collaboration between GPs and psychologists was considered unsatisfactory by 64% (n = 278) of psychologists. The main barriers reported were lack of time, lack of understanding and poor interactions/communication. Sixty-nine percent of psychologists felt that GPs knew little about their work. Psychologists had professional exchanges with an average of three local GPs and received referral information for 12% of new patients. Out of 10 new patients, 2 were referred by a GP. In a multivariate analysis, satisfactory collaboration was significantly associated with the number of GPs psychologists exchanged with (OR 1.29), receipt of referral information (OR 2.18) and a positive assessment of GPs' understanding of psychologists' activity (OR 3.35). Psychologists considered the collaboration between GPs and psychologists as substandard, as well as GPs' knowledge of psychologists' activity. More interactions and better understanding would improve their collaboration.

摘要

初级保健中的合作式心理健康实践显著改善了患者的健康状况。全科医生(GP)和心理学家之间的合作可以改善非药物性精神护理。对于心理学家对全科医生的看法及其合作情况,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在从心理学家的角度评估 GP 和心理学家之间合作的质量,并确定与满意合作相关的因素。我们于 2017 年 2 月向法国某一地区的所有私人心理学家邮寄了一份问卷。我们对与满意合作相关的因素进行了描述性和多变量分析。回复率为 38%(1128 名中的 434 名)。64%(278 名)的心理学家认为 GP 和心理学家之间的合作不尽如人意。报告的主要障碍是缺乏时间、缺乏理解和沟通不良。69%的心理学家认为 GP 对他们的工作知之甚少。心理学家与平均 3 名当地 GP 进行了专业交流,并收到了 12%新患者的转诊信息。在 10 名新患者中,有 2 名是由 GP 转诊的。在多变量分析中,满意的合作与心理学家与 GP 交流的数量(OR 1.29)、转诊信息的接收(OR 2.18)和 GP 对心理学家活动的理解的积极评估(OR 3.35)显著相关。心理学家认为 GP 和心理学家之间的合作以及 GP 对心理学家活动的了解都不尽如人意。更多的互动和更好的理解将改善他们的合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验