From the Department of Radiology (A.B.R.), NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
Hackensack Radiology Group, P.A. (G.N.N.), River Edge, New Jersey.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Oct;40(10):1610-1616. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6225. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Insight into the status of neuroradiology subspecialty certification across the United States could help to understand neuroradiologists' perceived value of subspecialty certification as well as guide efforts to optimize pathways for broader voluntary certification participation. Our aim was to assess board certification characteristics of practicing US neuroradiologists.
The American Board of Radiology public search engine was used to link Medicare-participating radiologists with American Board of Radiology diplomates. Among linked diplomates, 4670 neuroradiologists were identified on the basis of 3 criteria: current or prior neuroradiology subspecialty certification or currently >50% clinical work effort in neuroradiology based on work relative value unit-weighted national Medicare claims ("majority-practice neuroradiologists"). Subspecialty certification status was studied in each group, using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data to identify additional physician characteristics.
Of 3769 included radiologists ever subspecialty certified, 84.1% are currently subspecialty certified. Of 1777/3769 radiologists ever subspecialty-certified and with lifetime primary certificates (ie, nonmandated Maintenance of Certification), only 66.6% are currently subspecialty certified. Of 3341 included majority-practice neuroradiologists, 73.0% were ever subspecialty certified; of these, 89.1% are currently subspecialty certified. Of 3341 majority-practice neuroradiologists, the fraction currently subspecialty certified was higher for those in academic (81.3%) versus nonacademic (58.2%) practices, larger versus smaller practices (72.1% for those in ≥100 versus 36.1% for <10-member practices), US regions other than the West (64.1%-70.6% versus 56.5%), fewer years in practice (77.5% for 11-20 years versus 31.3% for >50 years), and time-limited (73.5%) versus lifetime (54.9%) primary certificates.
More than one-quarter of majority-practice neuroradiologists never obtained neuroradiology subspecialty certification. Even when initially obtained, that certification is commonly not maintained, particularly by lifetime primary certificate diplomates and those in nonacademic and smaller practices. Further investigation is warranted to better understand neuroradiologists' decisions regarding attaining and maintaining subspecialty certification.
深入了解美国神经放射学专业认证的现状,有助于了解神经放射学家对专业认证的认知价值,并为优化更广泛的自愿认证参与途径提供指导。我们的目的是评估美国执业神经放射学家的董事会认证特征。
使用美国放射学院(American Board of Radiology)的公共搜索引擎将 Medicare 参与放射科医生与美国放射学院(American Board of Radiology)的委员会成员联系起来。在所联系的委员会成员中,根据工作相对价值单位加权的全国 Medicare 索赔(“主要实践神经放射学家”),基于 3 项标准确定了 4670 名神经放射学家:目前或以前的神经放射学专业认证,或目前临床工作中神经放射学工作量>50%。使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)的数据研究了每个组的专业认证状况,以确定其他医生特征。
在 3769 名曾接受过专业认证的放射科医生中,84.1%的人目前接受专业认证。在 1777/3769 名曾接受专业认证且有终身主要证书(即非强制性的维持认证)的放射科医生中,只有 66.6%的人目前接受专业认证。在 3341 名主要实践神经放射学家中,73.0%的人曾接受过专业认证;其中,89.1%的人目前接受专业认证。在 3341 名主要实践神经放射学家中,在学术(81.3%)与非学术(58.2%)实践中,目前接受专业认证的比例更高,在较大(72.1%,≥100 名成员)与较小(36.1%,<10 名成员)实践中,在非美国西部(64.1%-70.6%)与美国西部(56.5%)地区,在实践年限较短(11-20 年,77.5%)与较长(>50 年,31.3%)的地区,以及在有时间限制(73.5%)与无时间限制(54.9%)的主要证书中,目前接受专业认证的比例更高。
超过四分之一的主要实践神经放射学家从未获得神经放射学专业认证。即使最初获得认证,通常也不会维持认证,特别是对于终身主要证书获得者和非学术和较小实践中的获得者。需要进一步调查,以更好地了解神经放射学家在获得和维持专业认证方面的决策。