Suppr超能文献

剖腹术闭合技术:外科医生是否遵循最新指南?问卷调查结果。

Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Incisional hernias after laparotomy are associated with significant morbidity and increased costs. Recent research on prevention of incisional hernia formation suggests that a laparotomy closure technique using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture with small fascial steps and bites in a continuous, single layer with a suture length to wound length (SL/WL) ratio of at least 4:1 is effective in lowering morbidity. Little is known about application of this evidence in daily practice. Therefore, a survey was performed among Dutch surgeons.

METHODS

All members of the Dutch Surgical Society were invited to participate in a 24-question online survey on techniques and materials used for abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical subspecialty, type of hospital and experience.

RESULTS

Response rate was 26% (402 respondents), representing 97% of all Dutch surgical departments. More than 90% of participants closed the abdominal wall in a single mass layer, using a slowly absorbable monofilament running suture The SL/WL ratio of >4:1 is practiced by only 35% of participants and preferred suture size was variable among participants. Risk factors for incisional hernia development were generally identified correctly but more than half of the participants were unaware of the incidence and time of occurrence of incisional hernia. Subgroup analysis found that gastrointestinal and oncologic surgeons preferred smaller diameter sutures and higher suture-length to wound-length ratios. Trauma, vascular and pediatric surgeons had lower estimates of incidence of incisional hernia than other subspecialties. Surgeons employed in academic hospitals were more likely to use small fascial steps and smaller suture sizes than their colleagues in non-academic hospitals. Correct estimates of incisional hernia incidence decreased when surgeons perform less than 10 laparotomies annually.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the latest evidence regarding closure techniques of the abdominal wall is not widespread. Only 35% of surgeons close the abdominal fascia using a suture length to wound length ratio of 4:1, which is recommended based on the latest evidence. Surgical trainees, gastrointestinal and oncological surgeons are most familiar with the recommended technique and use it in their daily practice. Efforts should be directed at improving spreading of this technique.

摘要

目的

剖腹术后切口疝与显著的发病率和增加的成本有关。最近关于预防切口疝形成的研究表明,使用一种缓慢吸收的单丝缝线,在筋膜小步切开、连续单层缝合,缝线长度与切口长度(SL/WL)比至少为 4:1 的剖腹切口关闭技术可有效降低发病率。但在日常实践中应用这一证据的情况知之甚少。因此,对荷兰外科医生进行了一项调查。

方法

邀请荷兰外科协会的所有成员参加一项关于经中线剖腹术后腹壁关闭技术和材料使用的 24 个问题的在线调查。根据手术亚专科、医院类型和经验进行了亚组分析。

结果

应答率为 26%(402 名受访者),代表了所有荷兰外科科室的 97%。超过 90%的参与者将腹壁缝合在一个单一的质量层中,使用一种缓慢吸收的单丝缝线。>4:1 的 SL/WL 比仅被 35%的参与者采用,首选缝线尺寸在参与者中也各不相同。切口疝发展的风险因素通常被正确识别,但超过一半的参与者不知道切口疝的发生率和发生时间。亚组分析发现,胃肠和肿瘤外科医生更喜欢较小直径的缝线和更高的缝线长度与切口长度比。创伤、血管和儿科外科医生对切口疝的发生率估计低于其他亚专科。在学术医院工作的外科医生比非学术医院的同事更有可能使用小筋膜步和较小的缝线尺寸。当外科医生每年进行的剖腹手术少于 10 例时,对切口疝发生率的正确估计会降低。

结论

最新关于腹壁关闭技术的证据的实施并不广泛。只有 35%的外科医生使用缝线长度与切口长度比为 4:1 来缝合腹部筋膜,这是基于最新证据推荐的。外科培训生、胃肠和肿瘤外科医生最熟悉推荐的技术,并在日常实践中使用。应努力提高该技术的普及程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验