Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Oct;22(10):641-647. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0102. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
While there is a growing body of research on how individuals evaluate interracial exclusion in offline settings, much less is known about evaluations of interracial exclusion in online settings. This study aimed to address this gap by examining evaluations by male adolescents and young adults ( = 151; = 17.59, standard deviation = 0.50) of interracial exclusion in both online and offline settings to understand these evaluations in concert. Furthermore, participants completed measures of offline and online intergroup contact, providing new evidence that intergroup contact in online settings is an important context for learning about others. The findings indicate that participants' online and offline intergroup contacts were related. In terms of evaluations of exclusion, participants were much more likely to attribute exclusion to nonrace-based reasons in online and offline settings than to race-based reasons. Additionally, participants with higher rates of intergroup contact were more likely to perceive race-based exclusion as wrong than those with low rates of contact. The novel findings document that young men's online and offline intergroup contact shape their evaluations of interracial exclusion in online settings.
虽然关于个体如何在线下环境中评估种族间排斥的研究越来越多,但对于在线环境中种族间排斥的评估却知之甚少。本研究旨在通过考察男性青少年和年轻人(n=151;M=17.59,标准差=0.50)对在线和线下环境中种族间排斥的评估来填补这一空白,以了解这些评估的协同作用。此外,参与者还完成了线下和线上群体接触的测量,为线上环境中的群体接触是了解他人的重要背景提供了新的证据。研究结果表明,参与者的线上和线下群体接触是相关的。在排斥的评估方面,参与者更有可能将排斥归因于非基于种族的原因,而不是基于种族的原因,无论是在线上还是线下环境中。此外,与接触率较低的参与者相比,接触率较高的参与者更有可能认为基于种族的排斥是错误的。这些新颖的发现表明,年轻人的线上和线下群体接触塑造了他们对在线环境中种族间排斥的评估。