Bidarra David, Constâncio Vera, Barros-Silva Daniela, Ramalho-Carvalho João, Moreira-Barbosa Catarina, Antunes Luís, Maurício Joaquina, Oliveira Jorge, Henrique Rui, Jerónimo Carmen
Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Master in Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar-University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal.
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 11;9:900. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00900. eCollection 2019.
Prostate Cancer (PCa) overdiagnosis and overtreatment, as a consequence of the limited specificity of current detection and prognostication methods, remains a major challenge in clinical practice. Therefore, development and validation of new molecular biomarkers amenable of detecting clinically significant disease is crucial. MicroRNAs (miRNA) deregulation is common in cancer, constituting potential non-invasive biomarkers for PCa detection and prognostication. Herein, we evaluated the screening and prognostic biomarker potential of two onco-microRNAs (miR-182-5p and miR-375-3p) in liquid biopsies (plasma) of PCa patients with clinically localized disease undergoing curative-intent treatment. A first cohort of 98 PCa and 15 normal prostates were used to assess PCa-specificity of miR-182-5p in tissues. A cohort composed of PCa 252 patients and 52 asymptomatic controls allowed for assessment of diagnostic and prognostic value in plasmas. After RNA extraction from tissue and plasma samples, cDNA synthesis specific for miRNAs was performed followed by measurement of miR-182-5p and miR-375-3p relative expression by RT-qPCR, using U6 snRNA gene as reference. MiR-182-5p was significantly overexpressed in PCa tissues ( < 0.0001) and in plasma of PCa patients ( = 0.0020), compared to respective controls. Moreover, miR-182-5p expression identified PCa with AUC = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.725-0.892, = 0.0001) in tissue and with 77% specificity and 99% NPV (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.561-0.709, = 0.0021) in plasma. Both circulating miR-182-5p and miR-375-3p levels associated with more advanced pathologic stage and the former was significantly higher in patients that developed metastasis ( = 0.0145). Indeed, at the time of diagnosis, circulating miR-375-3p levels predicted which patients would develop metastasis, with almost 50% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and a NPV of 89% (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.529-0.713, = 0.0149). We conclude that these two circulating miRNAs might be clinical useful as non-invasive biomarkers for detection and prediction of metastasis development at the diagnosis together with clinical variables used in routine practice.
由于当前检测和预后方法的特异性有限,前列腺癌(PCa)的过度诊断和过度治疗仍是临床实践中的一项重大挑战。因此,开发和验证适用于检测临床显著疾病的新型分子生物标志物至关重要。微小RNA(miRNA)失调在癌症中很常见,构成了PCa检测和预后的潜在非侵入性生物标志物。在此,我们评估了两种癌基因微小RNA(miR-182-5p和miR-375-3p)在接受根治性治疗的临床局限性疾病PCa患者的液体活检(血浆)中的筛查和预后生物标志物潜力。第一组98例PCa患者和15例正常前列腺用于评估miR-182-5p在组织中的PCa特异性。由252例PCa患者和52例无症状对照组成的队列用于评估血浆中的诊断和预后价值。从组织和血浆样本中提取RNA后,进行miRNA特异性的cDNA合成,然后以U6 snRNA基因为参照,通过RT-qPCR测量miR-182-5p和miR-375-3p的相对表达。与各自的对照相比,miR-182-5p在PCa组织(<0.0001)和PCa患者血浆(=0.0020)中显著过表达。此外,miR-182-5p表达在组织中鉴定PCa的AUC = 0.81(95%CI:0.725-0.892,=0.0001),在血浆中特异性为77%,NPV为99%(AUC = 0.64,95%CI:0.561-0.709,=0.0021)。循环miR-182-5p和miR-375-3p水平均与更晚期的病理阶段相关,前者在发生转移的患者中显著更高(=0.0145)。事实上,在诊断时,循环miR-375-3p水平可预测哪些患者会发生转移,敏感性近50%,特异性76%,NPV为89%(AUC = 0.62,95%CI:0.529-0.713,=0.0149)。我们得出结论,这两种循环miRNA作为非侵入性生物标志物,在诊断时与常规实践中使用的临床变量一起用于检测和预测转移发展可能具有临床实用性。