State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710048, China; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.
Water Res. 2019 Dec 15;167:115109. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115109. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
To address the common challenges in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) related to stability and unfavorable influent carbon to phosphorus ratio, a side-stream EBPR (S2EBPR) process that involves a side-stream anaerobic biological sludge hydrolysis and fermentation reactor was proposed as an emerging alternative. In this study, a full-scale pilot testing was performed with side-by-side operation of a conventional anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2O) process versus a S2EBPR process. A comparison of the performance, activity and microbial community between the two configurations was performed. The results demonstrated that, with the same influent wastewater characteristics, S2EBPR configuration showed improved P removal performance and stability than the conventional A2O configuration, especially when the mixers in the side-stream anaerobic reactor were operated intermittently. Mass balance analysis illustrated that both denitrification and EBPR were enhanced in S2EBPR configuration, where return activated sludge was diverted into the anaerobic zone to promote fermentation and enrichment of polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs), and the influent was bypassed to the anoxic zone for enhancing denitrification. A relatively higher PAO activity and total PAO abundance were observed in S2EBPR than in A2O configuration, accompanied by a higher degree of dependence on glycolysis pathway than tricarboxylic acid cycle. No significant difference in the relative abundances of putative PAOs, including Ca. Accumulibacter and Tetrasphaera, were observed between the two configurations. However, higher microbial community diversity indices were observed in S2EBPR configuration than in conventional one. In addition, consistently lower relative abundance of known glycogen accumulating organisms (GAOs) was observed in S2EBPR system. Extended anaerobic retention time and conditions that generate continuous and more complex volatile fatty acids in the side-stream anaerobic reactor of S2EBPR process likely give more competitive advantage for PAOs over GAOs. PAOs exhibited sustained EBPR activity and delayed decay under extended anaerobic condition, likely due to their versatile metabolic pathways depending on the availability and utilization of multiple intracellular polymers. This study provided new insights into the effects of implementing side-stream EBPR configuration on microbial populations, EBPR activity profiles and resulted system performance.
为了解决增强型生物除磷(EBPR)中稳定性和不利的进水碳磷比相关的常见挑战,提出了一种侧流 EBPR(S2EBPR)工艺,该工艺涉及侧流厌氧生物污泥水解和发酵反应器,是一种新兴的替代工艺。本研究采用传统的厌氧-缺氧-好氧(A2O)工艺与 S2EBPR 工艺的平行运行进行了全规模中试试验。对两种构型的性能、活性和微生物群落进行了比较。结果表明,在相同的进水废水特性下,S2EBPR 构型比传统的 A2O 构型表现出更好的除磷性能和稳定性,特别是当侧流厌氧反应器中的混合器间歇性运行时。质量平衡分析表明,S2EBPR 构型中同时增强了反硝化和 EBPR,回流活性污泥被分流到厌氧区以促进发酵和聚磷积累菌(PAO)的富集,进水绕过缺氧区以增强反硝化。与 A2O 构型相比,S2EBPR 中观察到相对较高的 PAO 活性和总 PAO 丰度,并且对糖酵解途径的依赖性高于三羧酸循环。在两种构型之间未观察到假定的 PAO 的相对丰度有显著差异,包括 Ca。Accumulibacter 和 Tetrasphaera。然而,在 S2EBPR 构型中观察到更高的微生物群落多样性指数。此外,在 S2EBPR 系统中始终观察到较低的已知糖原积累菌(GAO)的相对丰度。S2EBPR 工艺侧流厌氧反应器中持续更长的厌氧保留时间和产生连续且更复杂的挥发性脂肪酸的条件可能为 PAO 提供比 GAO 更具竞争力的优势。PAO 在延长的厌氧条件下表现出持续的 EBPR 活性和延迟衰减,这可能是由于它们依赖于多种细胞内聚合物的可用性和利用的多功能代谢途径。本研究提供了关于实施侧流 EBPR 构型对微生物种群、EBPR 活性谱和产生的系统性能的影响的新见解。