Suppr超能文献

经颅多普勒超声与磁共振血管造影在颅内动脉狭窄诊断中的准确性比较

Accuracy of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Compared with Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Artery Stenosis.

作者信息

Jaiswal Sandip Kumar, Fu-Ling Yan, Gu Lihua, Lico Renardo, Changyong Fu, Paula Angela

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jul;10(3):400-404. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696586. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

Abstract

One of the most common causes of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) is intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS). The goal of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) compared with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for diagnosing ICAS in patients with ACI.  Consecutive patients presenting with ACI to the neurology department underwent both MRA and TCD examination within 6 hours of difference. To calculate the agreement between the results of MRA and TCD, kappa coefficient test was used. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative TCD predictive values have been calculated in comparison with MRA.  A total of 115 patients was included. There were 77 males (66.95%) and 38 females (33.04%). The mean age of patients was 68.32 ± 10.66 years (range 29-80). The agreement between TCD and MRA in detecting stenosis was 0.56 for anterior circulation artery (ACA), and 0.40 for posterior circulation artery. For the detection of ICAS, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 85.9, 90.0, 98.2, and 50.0% for anterior cerebral artery and 73.5, 86.7, 96.2, and 40.0% for posterior cerebral artery, respectively.  Moderate agreement of anterior circulation stenosis and fair agreement for posterior circulation stenosis was found between TCD and MRA in the evaluation of ICAS. In anterior circulation, the diagnostic accuracy of TCD is higher compared with the posterior circulation.

摘要

急性脑梗死(ACI)最常见的病因之一是颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)。我们研究的目的是评估经颅多普勒(TCD)与磁共振血管造影(MRA)在诊断ACI患者ICAS方面的准确性。 连续因ACI就诊于神经内科的患者在相差6小时内接受了MRA和TCD检查。为计算MRA和TCD结果之间的一致性,采用了kappa系数检验。与MRA相比,计算了TCD的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。 共纳入115例患者。其中男性77例(66.95%),女性38例(33.04%)。患者的平均年龄为68.32±10.66岁(范围29 - 80岁)。TCD与MRA在检测前循环动脉(ACA)狭窄方面的一致性为0.56,在后循环动脉方面为0.40。对于ICAS的检测,大脑前动脉的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为85.9%、90.0%、98.2%和50.0%,大脑后动脉分别为73.5%、86.7%、96.2%和40.0%。 在ICAS评估中,TCD与MRA在前循环狭窄方面一致性中等,在后循环狭窄方面一致性尚可。在前循环中,TCD的诊断准确性高于后循环。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e01/6779567/57e7bcbd7ada/10-1055-s-0039-1696586_344_01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验