Mohd Sharif Nahdatul Aishah, Usman Juliana, Wan Safwani Wan Kamarul Zaman, Siew Li Goh, Abdul Karim Samihah, Mohamed Nur Anisah, Khan Soobia Saad, Khan Saad Jawaid
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Centre for Applied Biomechanics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019 Nov;233(11):1132-1140. doi: 10.1177/0954411919874614.
Knee sleeves are often prescribed to alleviate pain in people with early knee osteoarthritis. However, the biomechanics underlying their pain-relieving effect are still not well understood. This pre-post study aims at evaluating and comparing the effects of two different types of knee sleeves on knee adduction moment. Patients with clinically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis were recruited from the University of Malaya Medical Centre and were randomly assigned to two test groups using (1) a simple knee sleeve and (2) a simple sleeve with patella cutout. Knee adduction moment was collected using the Vicon motion capture system with two Kistler force plates. Pain, stiffness and physical functions were recorded using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. All measurements were taken before, immediately after and at the completion of 6 weeks of application (primary time point). In total, 17 participants with early unilateral knee osteoarthritis (47.7 (9.7) years) completed the study. Overall results show significant reduction in pain, early stance and late stance knee adduction moment and increased walking speed after 6 weeks of both knee sleeves application. This study results suggest that knee sleeves can reduce knee adduction moments in early unilateral knee osteoarthritis by 14.0% and 12.1% using the simple sleeve and the sleeve with patella cutout, respectively, and can potentially delay disease progression. In addition, knee sleeve with patella cutout does not provide additional benefits when compared to the simple knee sleeve.
膝关节护具常用于缓解早期膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛。然而,其缓解疼痛效果背后的生物力学机制仍未得到充分理解。这项前后对照研究旨在评估和比较两种不同类型的膝关节护具对膝关节内收力矩的影响。从马来亚大学医学中心招募临床诊断为膝关节骨关节炎的患者,并使用(1)简单膝关节护具和(2)带髌骨切口的简单护具将其随机分配到两个测试组。使用带有两个奇石乐测力板的Vicon运动捕捉系统收集膝关节内收力矩。使用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数记录疼痛、僵硬程度和身体功能。所有测量均在应用前、应用后立即以及应用6周结束时(主要时间点)进行。共有17名早期单侧膝关节骨关节炎患者(47.7(9.7)岁)完成了该研究。总体结果显示,在应用两种膝关节护具6周后,疼痛、早期站立和晚期站立时的膝关节内收力矩均显著降低,步行速度增加。本研究结果表明,膝关节护具使用简单护具和带髌骨切口的护具分别可使早期单侧膝关节骨关节炎患者的膝关节内收力矩降低14.0%和12.1%,并可能延缓疾病进展。此外,与简单膝关节护具相比,带髌骨切口的膝关节护具并未提供额外益处。