School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, People's Republic of China.
Org Biomol Chem. 2019 Oct 23;17(41):9232-9242. doi: 10.1039/c9ob01605h.
The condensation of carboxylic acids and amines mediated by silane derivatives provided a straightforward and sustainable method for amide bond formation with minimal waste. However, the detailed mechanism and structure-activity relationship of substrates, the topics that are of interest for both academic and industrial applications, were not clear. Herein, a systematic computational study was conducted to solve the two questions. We found that the two previously proposed mechanisms involving intramolecular acyl transfer or silanolate were less likely because the associated silanone intermediate and zwitterion adducts were too unstable with higher overall energy barriers. By comparison, the mechanism involving deprotonation of carboxylic acids, addition of carboxylates on silane reagents, dihydrogen formation to afford an acyloxysilane intermediate, carboxylic-acid-assisted addition of amines, and concerted proton transfer/amide formation, was found to be more favorable with overall energy barriers varying between 24 and 28 kcal mol-1 for the different calculated cases. Meanwhile, the dihydrogen formation and amide formation processes are both potential rate-determining steps. Energy composition, atomic charge, and distortion-interaction analyses indicated that the steric effect of silane reagents was more important than the electronic effect, making less bulky silane reagents more reactive. On the other hand, the dihydrogen formation process was mainly controlled by the electronic effect of the substituents of carboxylic acids and amines while the amide formation process was mainly influenced by their steric effect. As a result, less bulky, less acidic alkyl carboxylic acids are more reactive than unsaturated carboxylic acids, and less bulky, medium basic primary alkyl amines are more reactive than secondary alkyl amines and primary aryl amines. The related results provided deeper mechanistic insights into the amide bond formation mediated by silane derivatives and can act as a reference for further experimental design.
羧酸和胺的硅烷衍生物缩合为酰胺键的形成提供了一种直接且可持续的方法,产生的废物很少。然而,对于学术和工业应用都感兴趣的底物的详细机制和构效关系尚不清楚。在此,我们进行了系统的计算研究来解决这两个问题。我们发现,先前提出的两种机制,即涉及分子内酰基转移或硅醇盐的机制不太可能,因为相关的硅酮中间体和两性离子加合物不太稳定,总能量势垒较高。相比之下,涉及羧酸的去质子化、羧酸根加在硅烷试剂上、形成二氢以得到酰氧基硅烷中间体、羧酸辅助胺加成和协同质子转移/酰胺形成的机制被发现更有利,不同计算情况下的总能量势垒在 24 到 28 kcal mol-1 之间。同时,二氢形成和酰胺形成过程都是潜在的速率决定步骤。能量组成、原子电荷和变形相互作用分析表明,硅烷试剂的空间位阻效应比电子效应更重要,使得体积较小的硅烷试剂更具反应性。另一方面,二氢形成过程主要受羧酸和胺取代基的电子效应控制,而酰胺形成过程主要受其空间位阻效应影响。因此,体积较小、酸性较弱的脂肪族羧酸比不饱和羧酸更具反应性,体积较小、中等碱性的伯烷基胺比仲烷基胺和伯芳基胺更具反应性。相关结果提供了对硅烷衍生物介导的酰胺键形成的更深入的机制见解,并可以作为进一步实验设计的参考。