Suppr超能文献

家庭运动干预对下肢截肢者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

The effect of a home exercise intervention on persons with lower limb amputations: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jan;34(1):99-110. doi: 10.1177/0269215519880295. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish if a home-based exercise and education programme is more effective than usual treatment in improving function, mobility and quality of life in people with lower limb amputation due to peripheral vascular disease.

METHOD

A blocked randomized single-blinded controlled trial (RCT) with 154 participants (54 female; mean age 58) compared a home-based exercise and education programme (n = 77) with usual care (control) (n = 77). Participants were measured at baseline, immediately post intervention at three months, and after a further three months without any intervention. The outcome measures were the Barthel Index, Participation Scale, EuroQuol 5D, Modified Locomotor Capability Index and Timed Up and Go Test. Changes over time were established using generalized estimating equations and analysis of covariance, ( < 0.05).

RESULTS

The Participation Scale (18.73 ± 14.91 against 26.67 ± 19.14;  = 0.011), the EuroQuol5D visual analogue scale (69.10 ± 20.31 against 55.37 ± 27.67;  = 0.003), EuroQuol5D utility index (0.672 ± 0.300 against 0.532 ± 0.358;  = 0.25) and the Modified Capability Index (21.03 ± 15.79 against 15.91 ± 13.67;  = 0.034) improved in the intervention group compared with the control group at three months. At six months, there was no difference between the groups in any of the measures except for the EuroQuol5D visual analogue scale (74.52 ± 16.14 against 66.34 ± 22.91;  = 0.033). Although there were no differences between the Timed Up and Go test at 3 (35.39 ± 32.48 against 45.08 ± 41.52;  = 0.192) and six months (28.22 ± 20.96 against 36.08 ± 36.19;  = 0.189) between the groups the intervention group was more mobile.

CONCLUSION

This intervention improved function, mobility and quality of life in persons following lower limb amputation in the first three months post amputation.

摘要

目的

研究家庭为基础的锻炼和教育计划是否比常规治疗更能改善外周血管疾病导致下肢截肢者的功能、活动能力和生活质量。

方法

一项纳入 154 名参与者(54 名女性;平均年龄 58 岁)的分组随机单盲对照试验(RCT)将家庭为基础的锻炼和教育计划(n=77)与常规护理(对照组)(n=77)进行了比较。参与者在基线、干预后 3 个月(即刻)和无干预的进一步 3 个月时进行了测量。结局指标为巴氏指数、参与量表、欧洲五维健康量表、改良移动能力指数和计时起立行走测试。使用广义估计方程和协方差分析(  < 0.05)确定随时间的变化。

结果

与对照组相比,参与量表(18.73±14.91 对 26.67±19.14;  = 0.011)、欧洲五维健康量表视觉模拟量表(69.10±20.31 对 55.37±27.67;  = 0.003)、欧洲五维健康量表效用指数(0.672±0.300 对 0.532±0.358;  = 0.25)和改良能力指数(21.03±15.79 对 15.91±13.67;  = 0.034)在干预组在 3 个月时均有所改善。6 个月时,除欧洲五维健康量表视觉模拟量表(74.52±16.14 对 66.34±22.91;  = 0.033)外,两组在任何指标上均无差异。虽然在 3 个月时,Timed Up and Go 测试(35.39±32.48 对 45.08±41.52;  = 0.192)和 6 个月时(28.22±20.96 对 36.08±36.19;  = 0.189)两组之间的差异无统计学意义,但干预组的活动能力更强。

结论

该干预措施在下肢截肢后前 3 个月改善了下肢截肢者的功能、活动能力和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验