Division of Comprehensive Oral Health- Prosthodontics, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Department of General Dentistry, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;28(9):1037-1043. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13115. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
To evaluate the marginal fit of CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns made from lithium disilicate and zirconia using two different fabrication protocols (model and model-less).
Forty anterior all ceramic restorations (20 lithium disilicate, 20 zirconia) were fabricated from digital impressions using a CEREC Bluecam scanner. Two different digital workflows were used: a fully digital model-less approach and a printed model digital approach. The crowns were cemented on the respective prepared typodont teeth and marginal gap was evaluated using Micro-CT. Each specimen was analyzed in sagittal and trans-axial orientations, allowing evaluation of the marginal fit (vertical and horizontal) on each surface. Logarithmic transformation was used with a significance of 0.05. After that a reliability analysis was performed by re-measuring four randomized selected images for each specimen and performing intraclass correlations to determine any systematic bias in the measurements.
Vertical measurements in the lingual, distal and mesial views had an estimated marginal gap ranging from 101.9 to 133.9 µm for lithium disilicate crowns and 126.4 to 165.4 µm for zirconia. No significant differences were found between model and model-less techniques.
Both workflows are valid protocols for the fabrication of monolithic ceramic restorations. The use of a printed model did not improve the marginal fit of lithium disilicate or zirconia crowns. Both materials are also clinically acceptable, no matter which workflow was used to obtain the restoration.
评估使用两种不同制作方案(模型式和无模型式)制作的硅酸锂和氧化锆 CAD/CAM 全陶瓷冠的边缘适合性。
从数字印模中使用 CEREC Bluecam 扫描仪制作了 40 个前牙全陶瓷修复体(20 个硅酸锂,20 个氧化锆)。使用了两种不同的数字工作流程:完全无模型的方法和印模数字化方法。将冠体粘接到相应的预备牙体上,使用 Micro-CT 评估边缘间隙。每个样本均在矢状面和横轴面进行分析,以评估每个表面的边缘适合性(垂直和水平)。使用对数转换,置信水平为 0.05。之后,对每个样本的四个随机选择的图像进行重新测量,并进行组内相关分析,以确定测量是否存在系统偏差,从而进行可靠性分析。
在舌侧、远中侧和近中侧视图中,硅酸锂冠的垂直测量值估计为 101.9 至 133.9 µm,氧化锆冠的垂直测量值为 126.4 至 165.4 µm。在模型式和无模型式技术之间未发现显著差异。
两种工作流程都是制作整体陶瓷修复体的有效方案。使用印模并不能改善硅酸锂或氧化锆冠的边缘适合性。无论使用哪种工作流程获得修复体,这两种材料的临床效果都是可接受的。