Department of Personality, Psychological Assessment and Treatment, University of Deusto, Avenida de las Universidades, 24, 48007, Bilbao, Spain.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jul;49(7):1406-1419. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01128-6. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
Adolescence is often accompanied by an increase in stress and depression. Although there is considerable consensus about the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions to reduce these problems, the results for the role of dispositional mindfulness facets have been mixed. Recent studies have contributed to clarifying this role by identifying subtypes of individuals according to their profiles in mindfulness facets and examining the functioning of these profiles in relation to several self-reported indicators of wellbeing and health. The current study extends previous research by exploring mindfulness profiles in adolescents and by providing several sources of indicators (self-reports, parent-reports, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones) to examine the adaptive role of these profiles. A sample of 571 adolescents (50.61% girls; 12-17 years old) completed measures of mindfulness, depression, maladaptive schemas, and temperament (neuroticism, extraversion, and effortful control), and provided salivary samples for cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. In addition, 331 adolescents' parents completed measures of their children' temperaments. The results of latent profile analyses supported a three-profile solution: (1) moderate mindfulness (65.5%), (2) judgmental observing (24.2%), and (3) nonjudgmentally aware (10.3%). The judgmental observing profile was associated with a worse adjustment, indicated by higher depressive symptoms, maladaptive schemas, perceived stress, stress-associated hormones, and neuroticism, as well as lower scores on extroversion and effortful control. This profile was more frequent among the oldest adolescents. In contrast, the nonjudgmentally aware group presented a better adjustment and was more frequent among the youngest adolescents. These findings have implications for preventive interventions. Analyzing the specific profile of each adolescent can help improve individual intervention, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of each adolescent.
青春期通常伴随着压力和抑郁的增加。虽然有相当多的共识认为正念干预有助于减少这些问题,但对于特质正念方面的作用,结果却喜忧参半。最近的研究通过根据个体在正念方面的特征来确定其类型,并研究这些特征与几个自我报告的幸福感和健康指标之间的关系,为澄清这一作用做出了贡献。本研究通过探索青少年的正念特征,并提供几个指标的来源(自我报告、父母报告和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴激素)来检验这些特征的适应性作用,扩展了以往的研究。研究共纳入 571 名青少年(女生占 50.61%;年龄 12-17 岁),他们完成了正念、抑郁、适应不良模式和气质(神经质、外向性和努力控制)的测量,并提供了唾液样本用于检测皮质醇和脱氢表雄酮硫酸盐。此外,331 名青少年的父母完成了对其孩子气质的测量。潜在剖面分析的结果支持了一个三特征模型:(1)适度正念(65.5%)、(2)评判性观察(24.2%)和(3)非评判性觉察(10.3%)。评判性观察特征与更差的适应有关,表现为更高的抑郁症状、适应不良模式、感知压力、与压力相关的激素和神经质,以及更低的外向性和努力控制得分。该特征在年龄较大的青少年中更为常见。相比之下,非评判性觉察组的适应情况更好,且在年龄较小的青少年中更为常见。这些发现对预防干预具有启示意义。分析每个青少年的特定特征可以帮助改善个体干预,同时考虑到每个青少年的优点和缺点。