Mugeni Regine, Aduwo Jessica Y, Briker Sara M, Hormenu Thomas, Sumner Anne E, Horlyck-Romanovsky Margrethe F
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Oct 1;10:663. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00663. eCollection 2019.
Predicting undiagnosed diabetes is a critical step toward addressing the diabetes epidemic in populations of African descent worldwide. To review characteristics of equations developed, tested, or modified to predict diabetes in African descent populations. Using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, a scoping review yielded 585 research articles. After removal of duplicates ( = 205), 380 articles were reviewed. After title and abstract review 328 articles did not meet inclusion criteria and were excluded. Fifty-two articles were retained. However, full text review revealed that 44 of the 52 articles did not report findings by AROC or C-statistic in African descent populations. Therefore, eight articles remained. The 8 articles reported on a total of 15 prediction equation studies. The prediction equations were of two types. Prevalence prediction equations ( = 9) detected undiagnosed diabetes and were based on non-invasive variables only. Non-invasive variables included demographics, blood pressure and measures of body size. Incidence prediction equations ( = 6) predicted risk of developing diabetes and used either non-invasive variables or both non-invasive and invasive. Invasive variables required blood tests and included fasting glucose, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides (TG), and A1C. Prevalence prediction studies were conducted in the United States, Africa and Europe. Incidence prediction studies were conducted only in the United States. In all these studies, the performance of diabetes prediction equations was assessed by area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AROC) or the C-statistic. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of these equations based on standard criteria, specifically discrimination by either AROC or C-statistic were defined as: Poor (0.50 - 0.69); Acceptable (0.70 - 0.79); Excellent (0.80 - 0.89); or Outstanding (0.90 - 1.00). Prediction equations based only on non-invasive variables reported to have poor to acceptable detection of diabetes with AROC or C-statistic 0.64 - 0.79. In contrast, prediction equations which were based on both non-invasive and invasive variables had excellent diabetes detection with AROC or C-statistic 0.80 - 0.82. Equations which use a combination of non-invasive and invasive variables appear to be superior in the prediction of diabetes in African descent populations than equations that rely on non-invasive variables alone.
预测未诊断出的糖尿病是应对全球非洲裔人群糖尿病流行问题的关键一步。本研究旨在回顾已开发、测试或修改的用于预测非洲裔人群糖尿病的方程的特征。通过PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库进行范围综述,共获得585篇研究文章。去除重复项(n = 205)后,对380篇文章进行了审查。经过标题和摘要审查,328篇文章不符合纳入标准被排除。保留了52篇文章。然而,全文审查发现,这52篇文章中有44篇未报告非洲裔人群中通过曲线下面积(AROC)或C统计量得出的研究结果。因此,最终剩下8篇文章。这8篇文章共报道了15项预测方程研究。预测方程有两种类型。患病率预测方程(n = 9)用于检测未诊断出的糖尿病,仅基于非侵入性变量。非侵入性变量包括人口统计学特征、血压和身体尺寸测量值。发病率预测方程(n = 6)预测患糖尿病的风险,使用非侵入性变量或同时使用非侵入性和侵入性变量。侵入性变量需要进行血液检测,包括空腹血糖、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)、甘油三酯(TG)和糖化血红蛋白(A1C)。患病率预测研究在美国、非洲和欧洲进行。发病率预测研究仅在美国进行。在所有这些研究中,糖尿病预测方程的性能通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AROC)或C统计量进行评估。因此,我们根据标准标准评估了这些方程的有效性,具体而言,通过AROC或C统计量进行的区分定义为:差(0.50 - 0.69);可接受(0.70 - 0.79);优秀(0.80 - 0.89);或杰出(0.90 - 1.00)。仅基于非侵入性变量的预测方程报告显示,其通过AROC或C统计量检测糖尿病的能力为差到可接受,范围在0.64 - 至0.79。相比之下,基于非侵入性和侵入性变量的预测方程在检测糖尿病方面表现优秀,AROC或C统计量为0.80 - 0.82。在非洲裔人群中,使用非侵入性和侵入性变量组合的方程在糖尿病预测方面似乎比仅依赖非侵入性变量的方程更具优势。