• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧疗对急诊急性肺水肿患者机械通气风险的影响。

Effect of oxygen therapy on the risk of mechanical ventilation in emergency acute pulmonary edema patients.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital.

Clinical Research Unit, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):99-104. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000634.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000634
PMID:31633623
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of hyperoxemia on morbidity and mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our emergency department (ED) with ACPE who received arterial blood gases. Patients were classified based on the first PaO2 as hypoxemic (<75 mmHg), normoxemic (75-100 mmHg) and hyperoxemic (>100 mmHg). The primary outcome was the rates of mechanical ventilation (MV). We also reported adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the primary outcome after adjusting for predictors of MV determined a priori. Secondary outcomes were median hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We recruited 335 patients; 34.0% had hyperoxemia. The rates of normoxemia and hypoxemia were 27.5% and 38.5%, respectively. The rates of MV were: hypoxemic 60/129 (46.5%) vs. normoxemic 41/92 (44.6%) vs. hyperoxemic 50/114 (43.9%); P = 0.62. The AORs for MV for the hyperoxemic and hypoxemic groups (reference: normoxemic group) were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.53-1.79) and 1.38 (95% CI: 0.77-2.48), respectively. Intubation rates for the groups were: hypoxemic 15/129 (11.6%) vs. normoxemic 6/92 (6.5%) vs. hyperoxemic 12/114 (10.6%); P = 0.43. The secondary outcomes were comparable among the groups. In-hospital mortality rates were: hypoxemic 6/129 (4.7%) vs. 6/92 (6.5%) vs. 10/114 (8.8%); P = 0.42.

CONCLUSION

Our exploratory study did not report effects on mechanical ventilation, median hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality from hyperoxemia compared to hypoxemic and normoxemic ED patients with ACPE. Further studies are warranted to prove or disprove our findings.

摘要

目的

我们研究了高氧血症对急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE)患者发病率和死亡率的影响。

方法

我们对在急诊部(ED)接受动脉血气检查的 ACPE 患者进行了回顾性队列研究。患者根据首次 PaO2 分为低氧血症(<75mmHg)、氧合正常(75-100mmHg)和高氧血症(>100mmHg)。主要结局是机械通气(MV)的发生率。我们还报告了调整了机械通气预测因素后的主要结局的调整比值比(AOR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。次要结局是中位住院时间(LOS)和院内死亡率。

结果

我们共招募了 335 名患者,其中 34.0%存在高氧血症。氧合正常和低氧血症的发生率分别为 27.5%和 38.5%。MV 的发生率为:低氧血症 60/129(46.5%)与氧合正常 41/92(44.6%)与高氧血症 50/114(43.9%);P=0.62。高氧血症和低氧血症组的 MV 的 AOR(参考:氧合正常组)分别为 0.98(95%CI:0.53-1.79)和 1.38(95%CI:0.77-2.48)。各组的插管率为:低氧血症 15/129(11.6%)与氧合正常 6/92(6.5%)与高氧血症 12/114(10.6%);P=0.43。次要结局在各组之间相似。院内死亡率为:低氧血症 6/129(4.7%)与氧合正常 6/92(6.5%)与高氧血症 10/114(8.8%);P=0.42。

结论

与低氧血症和氧合正常的 ED 急性心源性肺水肿患者相比,我们的探索性研究未报告高氧血症对机械通气、中位住院 LOS 和院内死亡率的影响。需要进一步的研究来证实或反驳我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Effect of oxygen therapy on the risk of mechanical ventilation in emergency acute pulmonary edema patients.氧疗对急诊急性肺水肿患者机械通气风险的影响。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):99-104. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000634.
2
Hyperoxemia in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients-Insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study.有创通气的新冠病毒肺炎患者的高氧血症——来自PRoVENT-COVID研究的见解
Pulmonology. 2024 May-Jun;30(3):272-281. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Beneficial effects of rapid introduction of adaptive servo-ventilation in the emergency room in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.在急诊室对急性心源性肺水肿患者快速引入适应性伺服通气的有益效果。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
Most impactful predictors for hyperoxaemia in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease managed by Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Department.由紧急医疗服务和急诊科管理的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期高氧血症的最具影响力的预测因素。
Clin Respir J. 2019 Apr;13(4):256-266. doi: 10.1111/crj.13007. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Long-term effect of hyperoxemia during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation managed by emergency medical service and emergency department: a prospective, exploratory study.长期氧疗对急诊和急诊科管理的慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重患者的影响:一项前瞻性探索性研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):461-467. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000727.
6
The Impact of Hyperoxia on Outcome of Patients Treated with Noninvasive Respiratory Support.高氧对无创呼吸支持治疗患者结局的影响。
Can Respir J. 2020 May 6;2020:3953280. doi: 10.1155/2020/3953280. eCollection 2020.
7
Hyperoxemia and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的高氧血症与长期预后
Crit Care. 2013 Aug 19;17(4):R177. doi: 10.1186/cc12856.
8
[Spontaneous positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation in elderly patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Assessment in an emergency admissions unit].[老年心源性肺水肿患者的自主呼气末正压通气。在急诊收治单元的评估]
Presse Med. 1998 Jun 20;27(22):1089-94.
9
Continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.持续气道正压通气和双水平气道正压通气治疗急性心源性肺水肿
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90059-7.
10
Risk factors for intubation as a guide for noninvasive ventilation in patients with severe acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.作为重症急性心源性肺水肿患者无创通气指导的插管危险因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1921-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1922-9. Epub 2003 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Different Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure and Their Extensibility to Emergency Departments: A Critical Reappraisal.急性心力衰竭治疗不同指南的比较及其在急诊科的可扩展性:一项批判性再评估
J Clin Med. 2025 May 17;14(10):3522. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103522.
2
Oxygen Supplementation and Hyperoxia in Critically Ill Cardiac Patients: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Practice.危重症心脏病患者的氧疗与高氧血症:从病理生理学到临床实践
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug;1(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100065. Epub 2022 Aug 26.