Martsolf Grant R, Sochalski Julie
Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
RAND Corporation, RAND Health Care, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2019 Nov;20(4):183-185. doi: 10.1177/1527154419882310. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
We read with great interest Mundinger and Carter's exposition of how, in their view, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) education has lost its way and what consequences might result. Mundinger and Carter note that DNP programs are overwhelming focused on nonclinical practice. We share the concern of Mundinger and Carter about the future of nurse practitioner (NP) education within the context of expanding DNP programs. In this commentary, we raise concerns about NP transition to practice and the limited, but concerning, evidence that new NPs struggle in their transition to practice. We note that this concern is magnified as NPs continue to move into specialty roles. Health systems have responded to this concern by developing residency and fellowship programs. Fifteen years after the AACN position statement on the clinical doctorate was issued, the goal of DNP education remains an unfinished project. An important question remains: Can, will, and how should DNP programs deliver?
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了芒丁格和卡特关于他们认为护理实践博士(DNP)教育如何迷失方向以及可能产生何种后果的阐述。芒丁格和卡特指出,DNP项目绝大多数都聚焦于非临床实践。在DNP项目不断扩张的背景下,我们与芒丁格和卡特一样,对执业护士(NP)教育的未来感到担忧。在这篇评论中,我们对NP向实践的过渡以及新NP在过渡到实践过程中面临困难的有限但令人担忧的证据表示关切。我们指出,随着NP继续转向专科角色,这种担忧会加剧。卫生系统通过制定住院医师培训和专科 fellowship 项目来回应这一担忧。在护理专业组织(AACN)发布关于临床博士学位的立场声明15年后, DNP教育的目标仍是一个未完成的项目。一个重要的问题仍然存在:DNP项目能够、将会以及应该如何实现目标?