Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS 1018, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Arch Toxicol. 2019 Dec;93(12):3491-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02597-1. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury is an important clinical and toxicological problem. Understanding the mechanisms and modes of cell death are vital for the development of therapeutic interventions. The histological and clinical features of APAP hepatotoxicity including cell and organelle swelling, karyolysis, and extensive cell contents release lead to the characterization of the cell death as oncotic necrosis. However, the more recent identification of detailed signaling mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction, the amplification mechanisms of mitochondrial oxidant stress and peroxynitrite formation by a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, mechanisms of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and nuclear DNA fragmentation as well as the characterization of the sterile inflammatory response suggested that the mode of cell death is better termed programmed necrosis. Additional features like mitochondrial Bax translocation and cytochrome c release, mobilization of lysosomal iron and the activation of receptor-interacting protein kinases and the inflammasome raised the question whether other emerging modes of cell death such as apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis could also play a role. The current review summarizes the key mechanisms of APAP-induced liver injury and compares these with key features of the newly described modes of cell death. Based on the preponderance of experimental and clinical evidence, the mode of APAP-induced cell death should be termed programmed necrosis; despite some overlap with other modes of cell death, APAP hepatotoxicity does not fulfill the characteristics of either apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis or autophagic cell death.
对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)诱导的肝损伤是一个重要的临床和毒理学问题。了解细胞死亡的机制和方式对于治疗干预的发展至关重要。APAP 肝毒性的组织学和临床特征包括细胞和细胞器肿胀、核溶解和广泛的细胞内容物释放,导致细胞死亡特征为胀亡性坏死。然而,最近发现了线粒体功能障碍的详细信号机制、丝裂原激活蛋白激酶级联放大的线粒体氧化剂应激和过氧亚硝酸盐形成的放大机制、线粒体通透性转换孔开放和核 DNA 片段化的机制以及无菌炎症反应的特征,表明细胞死亡的方式更好地被称为程序性细胞坏死。其他特征,如线粒体 Bax 易位和细胞色素 c 释放、溶酶体铁的动员以及受体相互作用蛋白激酶和炎性小体的激活,提出了其他新兴的细胞死亡方式,如细胞凋亡、坏死性凋亡、铁死亡和细胞焦亡是否也可能发挥作用的问题。本综述总结了 APAP 诱导的肝损伤的关键机制,并将这些机制与新描述的细胞死亡方式的关键特征进行了比较。基于大量的实验和临床证据,APAP 诱导的细胞死亡方式应被称为程序性细胞坏死;尽管与其他细胞死亡方式有一些重叠,但 APAP 肝毒性不符合细胞凋亡、坏死性凋亡、铁死亡、细胞焦亡或自噬性细胞死亡的特征。
Arch Toxicol. 2019-10-22
Annu Rev Pathol. 2024-1-24
Adv Pharmacol. 2019
J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2024-8
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018-6-18
Semin Liver Dis. 2019-3-8
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025-6
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-5-21
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025-4-17
World J Gastroenterol. 2025-3-28
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2025-3-26
Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018-9-3
Cell Res. 2019-4-4
Front Physiol. 2019-2-26
Semin Liver Dis. 2019-3-8
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018-6-18
Liver Int. 2018-5-14
Curr Biol. 2018-2-19