• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介入肾脏病学家对门诊患者进行长期隧道式中心静脉导管置入术的效果、安全性和成本降低。

Effectiveness, safety and cost reduction of long-term tunneled central venous catheter insertion in outpatients performed by an interventional nephrologist.

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Integrada, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil.

Hospital Monsenhor Walfredo Gurgel, Natal, RN, Brasil.

出版信息

J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Mar;42(1):53-58. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0108. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0108
PMID:31661542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7213930/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Invasive procedures performed by trained nephrologists can reduce delays in making a definitive vascular access, complications, number of procedures on the same patient, and costs for the Public Health System.

OBJECTIVE

to demonstrate that a long-term tunneled central venous catheter (LTCVC) implanted by a nephrologist is safe, effective, and associated with excellent results.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed 149 consecutively performed temporary-to-long-term tunneled central venous catheter conversions in the operating room (OR) from a dialysis facility from March 2014 to September 2017. The data collected consisted of the total procedures performed, demographic characteristics of the study population, rates of success, aborted procedure, failure, complications, and catheter survival, and costs.

RESULTS

the main causes of end stage renal disease (ESRD) were systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus, 37.9% each. Patients had a high number of previous arteriovenous fistula (1.72 ± 0.84) and temporary catheter (2.87 ± 1.9) attempts until a definitive vascular access was achieved, while the preferred vascular site was right internal jugular vein (80%). Success, abortion, and failure rates were 93.3%, 2.7% and 4%, respectively, with only 5.36% of complications (minors). Overall LTCVC survival rates over 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 93.38, 71.81, 54.36, and 30.2%, respectively, with a mean of 298 ± 280 days (median 198 days). The procedure cost was around 496 dollars. Catheter dysfunction was the main reason for catheter removal (34%).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that placement of LTCVC by a nephrologist in an OR of a dialysis center is effective, safe, and results in substantial cost savings.

摘要

介绍

经过培训的肾病医生进行的有创操作可以减少确定血管通路的时间延误、减少并发症、减少同一患者的操作次数,并降低公共卫生系统的成本。

目的

证明由肾病医生植入的长期隧道中心静脉导管(LTCVC)是安全、有效且结果优异的。

方法

回顾性研究分析了 2014 年 3 月至 2017 年 9 月在透析中心手术室进行的 149 例连续临时至长期隧道中心静脉导管转换。收集的数据包括总操作次数、研究人群的人口统计学特征、成功率、中止手术、失败、并发症和导管存活率以及成本。

结果

终末期肾病(ESRD)的主要病因是系统性动脉高血压和糖尿病,各占 37.9%。患者在获得最终血管通路之前,有大量的动静脉瘘(1.72 ± 0.84)和临时导管(2.87 ± 1.9)尝试,首选血管部位为右颈内静脉(80%)。成功率、中止率和失败率分别为 93.3%、2.7%和 4%,并发症发生率仅为 5.36%(轻微)。1、3、6 和 12 个月的 LTCVC 总存活率分别为 93.38%、71.81%、54.36%和 30.2%,平均(中位数 198 天)为 298 ± 280 天。手术费用约为 496 美元。导管功能障碍是导管移除的主要原因(34%)。

结论

我们的分析表明,肾病医生在透析中心手术室进行 LTCVC 置管操作是有效、安全的,并且可以节省大量成本。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness, safety and cost reduction of long-term tunneled central venous catheter insertion in outpatients performed by an interventional nephrologist.介入肾脏病学家对门诊患者进行长期隧道式中心静脉导管置入术的效果、安全性和成本降低。
J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Mar;42(1):53-58. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0108. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
2
Translumbar hemodialysis long-term catheters: an alternative for vascular access failure.经腰大肌血液透析长期导管:血管通路失败的一种替代方案。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):89-94. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0080. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Using tunneled femoral vein catheters for "urgent start" dialysis patients: a preliminary report.使用隧道式股静脉导管用于“紧急开始”透析患者:初步报告。
J Vasc Access. 2014;15 Suppl 7:S101-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000252. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Outcomes of tunneled internal jugular venous catheters for chronic haemodialysis at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院隧道式颈内静脉导管用于慢性血液透析的效果
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Dec 3;31:218. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.218.17525. eCollection 2018.
5
Safety and efficacy of placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheter without the use of fluoroscopy.隧道式血液透析导管置管术不使用透视的安全性和有效性。
Clin Nephrol. 2020 Nov;94(5):237-244. doi: 10.5414/CN110076.
6
A Novel Inside-out Access Approach for Hemodialysis Catheter Placement in Patients With Thoracic Central Venous Occlusion.一种用于胸内中心静脉阻塞患者行血液透析导管置管的新型内外贯通入路方法。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Apr;75(4):480-487. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
7
Mediastinal approach to the placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with central vein occlusion in an outpatient access center.在门诊血管通路中心,针对中心静脉闭塞患者采用纵隔入路放置带隧道的血液透析导管。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Jul-Sep;12(3):258-61. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2010.6084.
8
Fluoroscopically guided vs modified traditional placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.透视引导下与改良传统置入带隧道血液透析导管的比较:临床结果与成本分析
J Vasc Access. 2007 Oct-Dec;8(4):245-51.
9
Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to tunneled hemodialysis catheters.临时血液透析导管转换为带隧道的血液透析导管。
Clin Nephrol. 2005 Mar;63(3):209-14. doi: 10.5414/cnp63209.
10
Placement of tunneled cuffed catheter for hemodialysis: Micropuncture kit versus Angiocath IV catheter.用于血液透析的带隧道带 cuff 导管的置入:微穿刺套件与静脉留置针导管的比较。
J Vasc Access. 2019 May;20(1_suppl):50-54. doi: 10.1177/1129729818777963. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Bedside Removal of Tunnelled Hemodialysis Catheter by Noninterventional Nephrologists among Adult Patients in the King Abdulaziz University Hospital Hemodialysis Centre in Jeddah: A Retrospective Cohort Study.吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院血液透析中心成年患者中,非介入性肾病学家在床边拔除隧道式血液透析导管的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Nephrol. 2023 Mar 27;2023:6905528. doi: 10.1155/2023/6905528. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Conversion from temporary to tunneled catheters by nephrologists: report of a single-center experience.肾脏病学家将临时导管转换为隧道式导管:单中心经验报告。
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2016 Apr 11;9:87-94. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S103424. eCollection 2016.
2
Radiation dose associated with dialysis vascular access interventional procedures in the interventional nephrology facility.介入肾脏病治疗机构中与透析血管通路介入手术相关的辐射剂量
Semin Dial. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):503-10. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12071. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
3
Insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters without fluoroscopy.
非透视下带隧道血液透析导管置入术
J Vasc Access. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):138-42. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100210.
4
Interventional nephrology: a new subspecialty of nephrology.介入肾脏病学:肾脏病学的一个新亚专业。
Hippokratia. 2007 Jan;11(1):22-4.
5
Fluoroscopically guided vs modified traditional placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.透视引导下与改良传统置入带隧道血液透析导管的比较:临床结果与成本分析
J Vasc Access. 2007 Oct-Dec;8(4):245-51.
6
Conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters.非隧道式血液透析导管转换为隧道式血液透析导管。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):222-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-006-0101-0.
7
Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access.血管通路临床实践指南。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul;48 Suppl 1:S176-247. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.029.
8
Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to permanent hemodialysis catheters: a retrospective study of catheter exchange versus classic de novo placement.临时血液透析导管转换为永久性血液透析导管:导管更换与经典重新置管的回顾性研究
Semin Dial. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):425-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.00081.x.
9
Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines.介入放射学会临床实践指南
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000094584.83406.3e.
10
Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS.欧美地区血管通路的使用情况:透析预后与实践模式研究(DOPPS)的结果
Kidney Int. 2002 Jan;61(1):305-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00117.x.