• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症抗原 19-9 与糖尿病风险的关联:一项前瞻性和孟德尔随机化研究。

Association between cancer antigen 19-9 and diabetes risk: A prospective and Mendelian randomization study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health for Incubating, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2020 May;11(3):585-593. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13166. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1111/jdi.13166
PMID:31661606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7232271/
Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Elevated serum cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels have been found in diabetes patients in most observational studies; however, whether there is a causal association between CA19-9 and diabetes mellitus is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study was carried out based on the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort comprising 27,009 individuals. We first investigated the associations between serum CA19-9 levels and incident diabetes mellitus risk in a prospective cohort study (12,700 individuals). Then, we explored the potential causal relationship between CA19-9 and diabetes mellitus risk in a cross-sectional study (3,349 diabetes mellitus patients and 8,341 controls) using Mendelian randomization analysis. A weighted genetic risk score was calculated by adding the CA19-9 increasing alleles in five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs17271883, rs3760776 and rs3760775 in FUT6, rs11880333 in CA11, rs265548 in B3GNT3, and rs1047781 in FUT2), which were identified in a previous genome-wide association study on serum CA19-9 levels.

RESULTS

In the prospective study, a total of 1,004 incident diabetes mellitus patients were diagnosed during a mean 4.54-year follow-up period. Elevated serum CA19-9 level was associated with a higher incident diabetes risk after adjustment for confounders, with a hazard ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.11-1.30) per standard deviation (12.17 U/mL) CA19-9 increase. Using the genetic score to estimate the unconfounded effect, we did not find a causal association of CA19-9 with diabetes risk (odds ratio per weighted CA19-9-increasing allele: 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.04; P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study did not support a causal association of serum CA19-9 with diabetes risk. CA19-9 might be a potential biomarker of incident diabetes mellitus risk.

摘要

目的/引言:在大多数观察性研究中,糖尿病患者的血清肿瘤相关抗原 19-9(CA19-9)水平升高;然而,CA19-9 与糖尿病之间是否存在因果关系尚不清楚。

材料和方法

我们的研究基于包含 27009 人的东风-同济队列进行。我们首先在一项前瞻性队列研究(12700 人)中研究了血清 CA19-9 水平与新发糖尿病风险之间的关联。然后,我们使用孟德尔随机化分析在横断面研究(3349 例糖尿病患者和 8341 例对照)中探讨 CA19-9 与糖尿病风险之间的潜在因果关系。通过在先前的血清 CA19-9 水平全基因组关联研究中鉴定的五个单核苷酸多态性(FUT6 中的 rs17271883、rs3760776 和 rs3760775、CA11 中的 rs11880333、B3GNT3 中的 rs265548 和 FUT2 中的 rs1047781),计算 CA19-9 增加的等位基因的加权遗传风险评分。

结果

在前瞻性研究中,在平均 4.54 年的随访期间,共诊断出 1004 例新发糖尿病患者。在调整混杂因素后,升高的血清 CA19-9 水平与更高的新发糖尿病风险相关,每标准偏差(12.17 U/mL)CA19-9 增加的风险比为 1.20(95%置信区间 1.11-1.30)。使用遗传评分估计未混杂的影响,我们没有发现 CA19-9 与糖尿病风险之间存在因果关系(每增加一个加权 CA19-9 增加的等位基因的比值比:0.99,95%置信区间 0.94-1.04;P=0.61)。

结论

本研究不支持血清 CA19-9 与糖尿病风险之间的因果关系。CA19-9 可能是新发糖尿病风险的潜在生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16a/7232271/a903716892e5/JDI-11-585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16a/7232271/a903716892e5/JDI-11-585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16a/7232271/a903716892e5/JDI-11-585-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between cancer antigen 19-9 and diabetes risk: A prospective and Mendelian randomization study.癌症抗原 19-9 与糖尿病风险的关联:一项前瞻性和孟德尔随机化研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 May;11(3):585-593. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13166. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Association between resting heart rate and incident diabetes risk: a Mendelian randomization study.静息心率与新发糖尿病风险的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01344-3. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
3
Genetically predicted serum uric acid levels and the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: A Mendelian randomization study.基于遗传预测的血清尿酸水平与糖尿病患者冠心病风险的关系:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1832-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study.γ-谷氨酰转移酶水平、糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1400-1409. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx006.
5
Mendelian randomization study of serum uric acid levels and diabetes risk: evidence from the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort.血清尿酸水平与糖尿病风险的孟德尔随机化研究:来自东风-同济队列的证据
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000834.
6
The impact of homocysteine on the risk of coronary artery diseases in individuals with diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study.同型半胱氨酸对糖尿病患者患冠状动脉疾病风险的影响:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Mar;58(3):301-307. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01608-3. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Gallstone Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study.胆石病与 2 型糖尿病风险:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Hepatology. 2019 Aug;70(2):610-620. doi: 10.1002/hep.30403. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels and incident risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged and elderly Chinese population: The Dongfeng-Tongji cohort study.血清碳水化合物抗原 125 水平与中国中老年人群 2 型糖尿病发病风险:东风-同济队列研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019 Sep;16(5):424-430. doi: 10.1177/1479164119843095. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
9
Mendelian Randomization Studies Do Not Support a Role for Vitamin D in Coronary Artery Disease.孟德尔随机化研究不支持维生素D在冠状动脉疾病中起作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Aug;9(4):349-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001396. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
Association of Body Mass Index With Cardiometabolic Disease in the UK Biobank: A Mendelian Randomization Study.英国生物库中体重指数与心脏代谢疾病的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):882-889. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5804.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-specific association between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and incident type 2 diabetes.CA19-9 与 2 型糖尿病发病风险的性别特异性关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73404-w.
2
Association of Circulating Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level with Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国成年人循环中糖类抗原19-9水平与2型糖尿病肾病的关联:一项横断面研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jan 31;17:467-477. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S434972. eCollection 2024.
3
Construction and validation of a prognostic risk model for breast cancer based on protein expression.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013.2013年中国糖尿病及糖尿病前期的患病率与民族分布特征
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2515-2523. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596.
2
Diabetes, Pancreatogenic Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer.糖尿病、胰腺源性糖尿病与胰腺癌
Diabetes. 2017 May;66(5):1103-1110. doi: 10.2337/db16-1477.
3
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图:2015年和2040年全球糖尿病患病率估计
基于蛋白质表达构建和验证乳腺癌预后风险模型。
BMC Med Genomics. 2022 Jul 4;15(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01299-5.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
4
MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data.孟德尔随机化:使用汇总数据执行孟德尔随机化分析的 R 包。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1734-1739. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx034.
5
The serum levels of tumor marker CA19-9, CEA, CA72-4, and NSE in type 2 diabetes without malignancy and the relations to the metabolic control.无恶性肿瘤的2型糖尿病患者血清肿瘤标志物CA19-9、癌胚抗原(CEA)、CA72-4和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平及其与代谢控制的关系。
Saudi Med J. 2017 Feb;38(2):204-208. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.2.15649.
6
Serum CA 19-9 and risk of incident diabetes in middle-aged and elderly Chinese: a prospective cohort study.
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Feb;54(2):201-208. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0937-y. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization.两样本孟德尔随机化中由于参与者重叠导致的偏倚。
Genet Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;40(7):597-608. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21998. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.使用加权中位数估计器对带有一些无效工具变量的孟德尔随机化进行一致性估计。
Genet Epidemiol. 2016 May;40(4):304-14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
CA 19-9: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects.CA 19-9:生化与临床方面
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:247-60. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_15.
10
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.使用无效工具变量的孟德尔随机化:通过Egger回归进行效应估计和偏差检测
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. Epub 2015 Jun 6.